Impact of body wearable sensor positions on UWB ranging
Fecha
2019Autor
Versión
Acceso abierto / Sarbide irekia
Tipo
Artículo / Artikulua
Versión
Versión aceptada / Onetsi den bertsioa
Identificador del proyecto
ES/2PE/TEC2017-90808
Impacto
|
10.1109/JSEN.2019.2935634
Resumen
In recent years, Ultrawideband (UWB) has become a very popular technology for time of flight (TOF) based localization and tracking applications but its human body interactions have not been studied yet extensively. Most UWB systems already proposed for pedestrian ranging have only been individually evaluated for a particular wearable sensor position. It is observed that wearable sensors mounted o ...
[++]
In recent years, Ultrawideband (UWB) has become a very popular technology for time of flight (TOF) based localization and tracking applications but its human body interactions have not been studied yet extensively. Most UWB systems already proposed for pedestrian ranging have only been individually evaluated for a particular wearable sensor position. It is observed that wearable sensors mounted on or close to the human body can raise line-of-sight (LOS), quasi-line-of-sight (QLOS), and non-line-of-sight (NLOS) scenarios leading to significant ranging errors depending on the relative heading angle (RHA) between the pedestrian, wearable sensor, and anchors. In this paper, it is presented that not only does the ranging error depend on the RHA, but on the position of the wearable sensors on the pedestrian. Seven wearable sensor locations namely, fore-head, hand, chest, wrist, arm, thigh and ankle are evaluated and a fair comparison is made through extensive measurements and experiments in a multipath environment. Using the direction in which the pedestrian is facing, the RHA between the pedestrian, wearable sensor, and anchors is computed. For each wearable sensor location, an UWB ranging error model with respect to the human body shadowing effect is proposed. A final conclusion is drawn that among the aforementioned wearable locations, the fore-head provides the best range estimate because it is able to set low mean range errors of about 20 cm in multipath conditions. The fore-head's performance is followed by the hand, wrist, ankle, arm, thigh, and chest in that order. [--]
Materias
Ultrawideband (UWB),
Time of flight (TOF),
Ranging,
Human body shadowing,
Wearable sensors
Editor
IEEE
Publicado en
IEEE Sensors Journal, 2019, 19 (23), 11449-11457
Departamento
Universidad Pública de Navarra. Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Electrónica y de Comunicación /
Nafarroako Unibertsitate Publikoa. Ingeniaritza Elektrikoa, Elektronikoa eta Telekomunikazio Ingeniaritza Saila /
Universidad Pública de Navarra/Nafarroako Unibertsitate Publikoa. Institute of Smart Cities - ISC
Versión del editor
Entidades Financiadoras
This work was supported in part by the Research Training Grants Program of the University of Deusto, in part by REPNIN+ under Grant TEC2017-90808-REDT and in part by Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Gobierno de España under Grant RTI2018-095499-B-C31.