Person: Giménez Díaz, Rafael
Loading...
Email Address
person.page.identifierURI
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
Last Name
Giménez Díaz
First Name
Rafael
person.page.departamento
Ingeniería
person.page.instituteName
IS-FOOD. Research Institute on Innovation & Sustainable Development in Food Chain
ORCID
0000-0003-3210-0578
person.page.upna
6698
Name
2 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Publication Open Access Evaluation of surface roughness parameters in agricultural soils with different tillage conditions using a laser profile meter(Elsevier, 2016) Martínez de Aguirre Escobar, Alejandro; Álvarez Mozos, Jesús; Giménez Díaz, Rafael; Proyectos e Ingeniería Rural; Landa Ingeniaritza eta ProiektuakSurface roughness crucially affects the hydrological and erosive behaviours of soils. In agricultural areas surface roughness is directly related to tillage, whose action strongly affects the key physical properties of soils and determines the occurrence and fate of several processes (e.g., surface storage, infiltration, etc.). The characterisation of surface roughness as a result of tillage operations is not straightforward, and numerous parameters and indices have been proposed for quantifying it. In this article, a database of 164 profiles (each 5 m long), measured in 5 different roughness classes, was analysed. Four roughness classes corresponded to typical tillage operations (i.e., mouldboard, harrow, seedbed, etc.), and the fifth represented a seedbed soil that was subject to rainfall. The aim of the research was to evaluate and select the surface roughness parameters that best characterised and quantified the surface roughness caused by typical tillage operations. In total, 21 roughness parameters (divided into 4 categories) were assessed. The parameters that best separated and characterised the different roughness classes were the limiting elevation difference (LD) and the Mean Upslope Depression index (MUD); however, the parameters most sensitive to rainfall action on seedbed soils were limiting slope (LS) and the crossover lengths measured with the semivariogram method (lSMV) and the root mean square method (lRMS). Many parameters had high degrees of correlation with each other, and therefore gave almost identical information. The results of this study may contribute to the understanding of the surface roughness phenomenon and its parameterisation in agricultural soils.Publication Open Access Evaluation of 2D models for the prediction of surface depression storage using realistic reference values(Wiley, 2016) Giménez Díaz, Rafael; Mezkiritz Barberena, Irantzu; Campo-Bescós, Miguel; Álvarez Mozos, Jesús; González de Audícana Amenábar, María; Martínez de Aguirre Escobar, Alejandro; Casalí Sarasíbar, Javier; Proyectos e Ingeniería Rural; Landa Ingeniaritza eta ProiektuakDepression storage (DS) is the maximum storage of precipitation and runoff in the soil surface at a given slope. The DS is determined by soil roughness that in agricultural soils is largely affected by tillage. The direct measurement of DS is not straightforward because of the natural permeability of the soil. Therefore, DS has generally been estimated from 2D/3D empirical relationships and numerical algorithms based on roughness indexes and height measurements of the soil surface, respectively. The objective of this work was to evaluate the performance of some 2D models for DS, using direct and reliable measurements of DS in an agricultural soil as reference values. The study was carried out in experimental microplots where DS was measured in six situations resulting from the combination of three types of tillage carried out parallel and perpendicular to the main slope. Those data were used as reference to evaluate four empirical models and a numerical method. Longitudinal altitudinal profiles of the relief were obtained by a laser profilometer. Infiltration measurements were carried out before and after tillage. The DS was largely affected by tillage and its direction. Highest values of DS are found on rougher surfaces mainly when macroforms cut off the dominant slope. The empirical models had a limited performance while the numerical method was the most effective, even so, with an important variability. In addition, a correct hydrological management should take into account that each type of soil tillage affects infiltration rate differently.