Person: Giménez Díaz, Rafael
Loading...
Email Address
person.page.identifierURI
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
Last Name
Giménez Díaz
First Name
Rafael
person.page.departamento
Ingeniería
person.page.instituteName
IS-FOOD. Research Institute on Innovation & Sustainable Development in Food Chain
ORCID
0000-0003-3210-0578
person.page.upna
6698
Name
4 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Publication Open Access Influence of surface roughness sample size for C-band SAR backscatter applications on agricultural soils(IEEE, 2017) Martínez de Aguirre Escobar, Alejandro; Álvarez Mozos, Jesús; Lievens, Hans; Verhoest, Niko E. C.; Giménez Díaz, Rafael; Landa Ingeniaritza eta Proiektuak; Institute on Innovation and Sustainable Development in Food Chain - ISFOOD; Proyectos e Ingeniería RuralSoil surface roughness determines the backscatter coefficient observed by radar sensors. The objective of this letter was to determine the surface roughness sample size required in synthetic aperture radar applications and to provide some guidelines on roughness characterization in agricultural soils for these applications. With this aim, a data set consisting of ten ENVISAT/ASAR observations acquired coinciding with soil moisture and surface roughness surveys has been processed. The analysis consisted of: 1) assessing the accuracies of roughness parameters s and l depending on the number of 1-m-long profiles measured per field; 2) computing the correlation of field average roughness parameters with backscatter observations; and 3) evaluating the goodness of fit of three widely used backscatter models, i.e., integral equation model (IEM), geometrical optics model (GOM), and Oh model. The results obtained illustrate a different behavior of the two roughness parameters. A minimum of 10-15 profiles can be considered sufficient for an accurate determination of s, while 20 profiles might still be not enough for accurately estimating l. The correlation analysis revealed a clear sensitivity of backscatter to surface roughness. For sample sizes >15 profiles, R values were as high as 0.6 for s and ~0.35 for l, while for smaller sample sizes R values dropped significantly. Similar results were obtained when applying the backscatter models, with enhanced model precision for larger sample sizes. However, IEM and GOM results were poorer than those obtained with the Oh model and more affected by lower sample sizes, probably due to larger uncertainly of l.Publication Open Access Evaluation of surface roughness parameters in agricultural soils with different tillage conditions using a laser profile meter(Elsevier, 2016) Martínez de Aguirre Escobar, Alejandro; Álvarez Mozos, Jesús; Giménez Díaz, Rafael; Proyectos e Ingeniería Rural; Landa Ingeniaritza eta ProiektuakSurface roughness crucially affects the hydrological and erosive behaviours of soils. In agricultural areas surface roughness is directly related to tillage, whose action strongly affects the key physical properties of soils and determines the occurrence and fate of several processes (e.g., surface storage, infiltration, etc.). The characterisation of surface roughness as a result of tillage operations is not straightforward, and numerous parameters and indices have been proposed for quantifying it. In this article, a database of 164 profiles (each 5 m long), measured in 5 different roughness classes, was analysed. Four roughness classes corresponded to typical tillage operations (i.e., mouldboard, harrow, seedbed, etc.), and the fifth represented a seedbed soil that was subject to rainfall. The aim of the research was to evaluate and select the surface roughness parameters that best characterised and quantified the surface roughness caused by typical tillage operations. In total, 21 roughness parameters (divided into 4 categories) were assessed. The parameters that best separated and characterised the different roughness classes were the limiting elevation difference (LD) and the Mean Upslope Depression index (MUD); however, the parameters most sensitive to rainfall action on seedbed soils were limiting slope (LS) and the crossover lengths measured with the semivariogram method (lSMV) and the root mean square method (lRMS). Many parameters had high degrees of correlation with each other, and therefore gave almost identical information. The results of this study may contribute to the understanding of the surface roughness phenomenon and its parameterisation in agricultural soils.Publication Open Access Evaluation of 2D models for the prediction of surface depression storage using realistic reference values(Wiley, 2016) Giménez Díaz, Rafael; Mezkiritz Barberena, Irantzu; Campo-Bescós, Miguel; Álvarez Mozos, Jesús; González de Audícana Amenábar, María; Martínez de Aguirre Escobar, Alejandro; Casalí Sarasíbar, Javier; Proyectos e Ingeniería Rural; Landa Ingeniaritza eta ProiektuakDepression storage (DS) is the maximum storage of precipitation and runoff in the soil surface at a given slope. The DS is determined by soil roughness that in agricultural soils is largely affected by tillage. The direct measurement of DS is not straightforward because of the natural permeability of the soil. Therefore, DS has generally been estimated from 2D/3D empirical relationships and numerical algorithms based on roughness indexes and height measurements of the soil surface, respectively. The objective of this work was to evaluate the performance of some 2D models for DS, using direct and reliable measurements of DS in an agricultural soil as reference values. The study was carried out in experimental microplots where DS was measured in six situations resulting from the combination of three types of tillage carried out parallel and perpendicular to the main slope. Those data were used as reference to evaluate four empirical models and a numerical method. Longitudinal altitudinal profiles of the relief were obtained by a laser profilometer. Infiltration measurements were carried out before and after tillage. The DS was largely affected by tillage and its direction. Highest values of DS are found on rougher surfaces mainly when macroforms cut off the dominant slope. The empirical models had a limited performance while the numerical method was the most effective, even so, with an important variability. In addition, a correct hydrological management should take into account that each type of soil tillage affects infiltration rate differently.Publication Open Access On the influence of spatial resolution in soil surface roughness characterization using Tls and Sfm techniques(IEEE, 2018) Martínez de Aguirre Escobar, Alejandro; Álvarez Mozos, Jesús; Giménez Díaz, Rafael; Milenković, Milutin; Pfeifer, Norbert; Ingeniería; IngeniaritzaSoil surface roughness strongly affects the scattering of microwaves and determines the backscattering coefficient observed by SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) sensors. The aim of this study is to analyze the influence of the spatial resolution of Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS) and Structure from Motion (SfM) techniques to parameterize surface roughness over agricultural soils. Three experimental plots (5 x 5 meters) representing different roughness conditions were measured by TLS and SfM techniques. Roughness parameters (s and l) were calculated from profiles obtained at different spatial resolutions in parallel and in perpendicular to the tillage direction on each plot. The results showed minor differences in the parameters values between both techniques and, in general, a decreasing trend and an increasing trend for lower spatial resolutions for parameter s and l, respectively.