Gil Berrozpe, Gustavo José
Loading...
Email Address
person.page.identifierURI
Birth Date
Job Title
Last Name
Gil Berrozpe
First Name
Gustavo José
person.page.departamento
Ciencias de la Salud
person.page.instituteName
ORCID
person.page.observainves
person.page.upna
Name
- Publications
- item.page.relationships.isAdvisorOfPublication
- item.page.relationships.isAdvisorTFEOfPublication
- item.page.relationships.isAuthorMDOfPublication
6 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Publication Open Access Cognitive intraindividual variability, cognitive impairment and psychosocial functioning in first-episode psychosis patients(Elsevier, 2023-09-08) Sánchez Torres, Ana María; García de Jalón, Elena; Gil Berrozpe, Gustavo José; Peralta Martín, Víctor; Cuesta, Manuel J.; PEPsNa Group; Ciencias de la Salud; Osasun ZientziakCognitive intraindividual variability (IIV) refers to fluctuations in performance across tasks (i.e. dispersion) or in a single task on multiple occasions (i.e. inconsistency). Little is known about IIV in patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP). We aimed to explore the association between IIV and both global cognitive performance and psychosocial functioning in a sample of 103 FEP patients. Patients were recruited at discharge from the PEPsNa program, a FEP follow-up intervention program lasting 24 months. The Social and Occupational Functioning Scale (SOFAS) and the Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI-Sp) were employed for assessing psychosocial functioning. Cognitive assessments were performed using the MATRICS Cognitive Assessment Battery (MCCB), and the variability in the cognitive functions assessed with the MCCB was used to calculate the IIV. Significant correlations were obtained between IIV and global MCCB scores, the CAI-Sp and the SOFAS. We found significant differences in psychosocial functioning and cognitive performance between patients with high and low IIV. A higher IIV in FEP patients was related both to worse psychosocial functioning and worse global cognitive performance. Unlike global cognitive performance, IIV was not related to clinical characteristics, suggesting that it could be an indicator of cognitive impairment even in the absence of global impairment.Publication Open Access Neurocognitive correlates of the varied domains of outcomes at 20 year follow-up of first-episode psychosis(Elsevier, 2022-11-02) Cuesta, Manuel J.; Sánchez-Torres, A. M.; Moreno-Izco, Lucía; García de Jalón, Elena; Gil Berrozpe, Gustavo José; Zarzuela, Amalia; Peralta Martín, Víctor; SEGPEPs Group; Sánchez Torres, Ana María; Ciencias de la Salud; Osasun Zientziak; Gobierno de Navarra / Nafarroako GobernuaLittle is known about long-term outcomes of the first episode of psychosis (FEP) other than in the symptomatic domain. We hypothesised that cognitive impairment is associated with poorer multi-domain outcomes at a long-term follow-up of FEP patients. We followed-up 172 FEP patients for a mean of 20.3 years. Ten outcome dimensions were assessed (symptomatic, functional and personal recovery, social disadvantage, physical health, suicide attempts, number of episodes, current drug use, chlorpromazine equivalent doses (CPZ), and schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder final diagnosis). Cognition was assessed at follow-up. Processing speed and verbal memory deficits showed significant associations with poor outcomes on symptomatic, social functioning, social disadvantage, higher number of episodes, and higher CPZ. Significant associations were found between visual memory impairments were significantly associated with low symptomatic and functional recovery, between attentional deficits and a final diagnosis of schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder, and between social cognition deficits and poor personal recovery.Lower cognitive global scores were significantly associated with all outcome dimensions except for drug abuse and physical status. Using multiple outcome dimensions allowed for the inclusion of the patients¿ perspective and other commonly neglected outcome measures. Taken together, cognitive impairment in FEP patients is strongly related to poor performance on several outcome dimensions beyond symptomatic remission.Publication Open Access Assessment of cognitive impairment in psychosis spectrum disorders through self-reported and interview-based measures(Springer, 2022) Sánchez Torres, Ana María; Moreno-Izco, Lucía; Gil Berrozpe, Gustavo José; Lorente Omeñaca, Ruth; Zandio, María; Zarzuela, Amalia; Peralta Martín, Víctor; Cuesta, Manuel J.; Ciencias de la Salud; Osasun ZientziakSelf-reported and interview-based measures can be considered coprimary measures of cognitive performance. We aimed to ascertain to what extent cognitive impairment in psychotic disorders, as assessed with a neuropsychological battery, is associated with subjective cognitive complaints compared to difficulties in daily activities caused by cognitive impairment. We assessed 114 patients who had a psychotic disorder with a set of neuropsychological tests and two additional measures: the Cognitive Assessment Interview-Spanish version (CAI-Sp) and the Frankfurt Complaint Questionnaire (FCQ). Patients also underwent a clinical assessment. The CAI-Sp correlated significantly with all the clinical dimensions, while the FCQ correlated only with positive and depressive symptoms. The CAI-Sp correlated significantly with all cognitive domains, except for verbal memory and social cognition. The FCQ was associated with attention, processing speed and working memory. The combination of manic and depressive symptoms and attention, processing speed, working memory and explained 38–46% of the variance in the patients’ CAI-Sp. Education and negative symptoms, in combination with attention, processing speed, and executive functions, explained 54–59% of the CAI-Sp rater’s variance. Only negative symptoms explained the variance in the CAI-Sp informant scores (37–42%). Depressive symptoms with attention and working memory explained 15% of the FCQ variance. The ability to detect cognitive impairment with the CAI-Sp and the FCQ opens the possibility to consider these instruments to approximate cognitive impairment in clinical settings due to their ease of application and because they are less time-consuming for clinicians.Publication Open Access The network structure of cognitive deficits in first episode psychosis patients(Elsevier, 2022-06-01) Sánchez Torres, Ana María; Peralta Martín, Víctor; Gil Berrozpe, Gustavo José; Mezquida, Gisela; Ribeiro Fernández, María; Molina-García, Mariola; Amoretti, Silvia; Lobo, Antonio; González Pinto, Ana; Merchán-Naranjo, Jessica; Corripio, Iluminada; Vieta, Eduard; Serna, Elena de la; Bergé, Daniel; Bernardo, Miguel; Cuesta, Manuel J.; PEPs Group; Ciencias de la Salud; Osasun Zientziak; Gobierno de Navarra / Nafarroako GobernuaNetwork analysis is an important conceptual and analytical approach in mental health research. However, few studies have used network analysis to examine the structure of cognitive performance in psychotic disorders. We examined the network structure of the cognitive scores of a sample of 207 first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients and 188 healthy controls. Participants were assessed using a battery of 10 neuropsychological tests. Fourteen cognitive scores encompassing six cognitive domains and premorbid IQ were selected to perform the network analysis. Many similarities were found in the network structure of FEP patients and healthy controls. Verbal memory, attention, working memory and executive function nodes were the most central nodes in the network. Nodes in both groups corresponding to the same tests tended to be strongly connected. Verbal memory, attention, working memory and executive function were central dimensions in the cognitive network of FEP patients and controls. These results suggest that the interplay between these core dimensions is essential for demands to solve complex tasks, and these interactions may guide the aims of cognitive rehabilitation. Network analysis of cognitive dimensions might have therapeutic implications that deserve further research.Publication Embargo Interrelationships between polygenic risk scores, cognition, symptoms, and functioning in first-episode psychosis: a network analysis approach(Elsevier, 2025-03-01) Gil Berrozpe, Gustavo José; Segura, Àlex G.; Sánchez Torres, Ana María; Amoretti, Silvia; Giné-Servén, Eloi; Vieta, Eduard; Mezquida, Gisela; Lobo, Antonio; González Pinto, Ana; Andreu-Bernabeu, Álvaro; Roldán, Alexandra; Forte, María Florencia; Castro, Josefina; Bergé, Daniel; Rodríguez, Natalia; Ballesteros, Alejandro; Mas, Sergi; Cuesta, Manuel J.; Bernardo, Miguel; PEPs Group; Ciencias de la Salud; Osasun ZientziakPsychopathological manifestations and cognitive impairments are core features of psychotic disorders. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) offer insights into the relationships between genetic vulnerability, symptomatology, and cognitive impairments. This study used a network analysis to explore the connections between PRS, cognition, psychopathology, and overall functional outcomes in individuals experiencing a first episode of psychosis (FEP). The study sample comprised 132 patients with FEP. Genetic data were used to construct PRS for mental disorders and cognitive traits via PRS-continuous shrinkage. We conducted comprehensive clinical and neuropsychological assessments at 2 months post-diagnosis and again at a 2-year follow-up. A network analysis was performed to generate two distinct networks and their centrality indices, encompassing 19 variables across domains such as symptoms, cognition, functioning, and PRS. Variables were grouped within related domains, and stronger relationships were observed within domains than between them. PRS for schizophrenia showed weak negative associations with attention, working memory, and verbal memory, while PRS for cognitive performance showed weak positive associations with attention. Negative symptoms were negatively associated with functioning and verbal memory at both the 2-month and 2-year assessments, as well as with social cognition at 2 years. Poor functioning was moderately related to greater severity of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale dimensions. This study identified pathways linking PRS, cognition, symptoms, and functioning, suggesting that genetic risk may serve as a marker of vulnerability and disorder progression. The findings also highlight the importance of considering genetic predispositions alongside clinical and cognitive factors to better understand the heterogeneity of psychotic disorders.Publication Open Access A neuropsychological study on Leonhard's nosological system(Springer, 2022-04-01) Cuesta, Manuel J.; Sánchez Torres, Ana María; Gil Berrozpe, Gustavo José; Lorente Omeñaca, Ruth; Moreno-Izco, Lucía; Peralta Martín, Víctor; SEGPEPs Group; Ciencias de la Salud; Osasun Zientziak; Gobierno de Navarra / Nafarroako GobernuaPhenotype validation of endogenous psychosis is a problem that remains to be solved. This study investigated the neuropsychological performance of endogenous psychosis subtypes according to Wernicke–Kleist–Leonhard’s classification system (WKL). The participants included consecutive admissions of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder or mood disorder with psychotic symptoms (N = 98) and healthy comparison subjects (N = 50). The patients were assessed by means of semi-structured interviews and diagnosed through the WKL system into three groups: a manic-depressive illness and cycloid psychosis group (MDC), unsystematic schizophrenia (USch) and systematic schizophrenia (SSch). All the participants completed a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. The three Leonhard’s psychosis subtypes showed a common neuropsychological profile with differences in the severity of impairment relative to healthy controls. MDC patients showed better performance on premorbid intelligence, verbal memory and global cognitive index than USch and SSch patients, and they showed better performance on processing speed, and working memory than SSch patients. USch patients outperformed SSch patients in verbal memory, working memory and global cognitive index. Neuropsychological performance showed a modest accuracy for classification into the WKL nosology. Our results suggest the existence of a common profile of cognitive impairment cutting across WKL subtypes of endogenous psychosis but with significant differences on a severity continuum. In addition, classification accuracy in the three WKL subtypes by means of neuropsychological performance was modest, ranging between 40 and 64% of correctly classified patients.