Husillos Carques, Francisco Javier
Loading...
Email Address
person.page.identifierURI
Birth Date
Job Title
Last Name
Husillos Carques
First Name
Francisco Javier
person.page.departamento
Gestión de Empresas
person.page.instituteName
INARBE. Institute for Advanced Research in Business and Economics
ORCID
person.page.observainves
person.page.upna
Name
- Publications
- item.page.relationships.isAdvisorOfPublication
- item.page.relationships.isAdvisorTFEOfPublication
- item.page.relationships.isAuthorMDOfPublication
3 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Publication Open Access Tracking habitus across a transnational professional field(SAGE, 2016) Spence, Crawford; Carter, Chris; Belal, Ataur; Husillos Carques, Francisco Javier; Archel Domench, Pablo; Gestión de Empresas; Enpresen KudeaketaThe sociology of the professions has shied away from cross-national comparative work. Yet research in different professional jurisdictions emphasizes the transnational nature of professional fields. Further work is therefore needed that explores the extent to which transnational professional fields are characterized by unity or heterogeneity. To that end, this article presents the results of a qualitative interrogation of the habitus of partners in 'Big 4' professional service firms across, primarily, five countries (Bangladesh, Canada, France, Spain and the UK). Marked differences are observed between the partner habitus in Bangladesh and the other countries studied in terms of entrepreneurial and public service dispositions. In turn, these findings highlight the methodological relevance of habitus for both the sociology of the professions and comparative capitalism literatures: for the former, habitus aids in mapping the dynamics of transnational professional fields; for the latter, habitus can elucidate the informal norms and conventions of national business systems.Publication Open Access Taste matters: cultural capital and elites in proximate Strategic Action Fields(SAGE, 2017) Spence, Crawford; Carter, Chris; Husillos Carques, Francisco Javier; Archel Domench, Pablo; Gestión de Empresas; Enpresen KudeaketaRecent literature suggests that elites are increasingly fragmented and divided. Yet there is very little empirical research that maps the distinctions between different elite groups. This article explores the cultural divisions that pertain to elite factions in two distinct but proximate Strategic Action Fields. A key insight from the article is that the public sector faction studied exhibits a much broader, more aesthetic set of cultural dispositions than their private sector counterparts. This permits a number of interrelated contributions to be made to literature on both elites and field theory. First, the findings suggest that cultural capital acts as a salient source of distinction between elite factions in different Strategic Action Fields. Second, it is demonstrated how cultural capital is socially functional as certain cultural dispositions are strongly homologous with specific professional roles. Third, the article demonstrates the implications for the structure of the State when two culturally distinct elites are brought together in a new Strategic Action Field.Publication Open Access Global ends, local means: cross-national homogeneity in professional service firms(SAGE, 2015) Spence, Crawford; Dambrin, Claire; Carter, Chris; Husillos Carques, Francisco Javier; Archel Domench, Pablo; Gestión de Empresas; Enpresen KudeaketaAn expanding institutionalist literature on professional service firms (PSFs) emphasizes that these are ridden by contradictions, paradoxes and conflicting logics. More specifically, literature looking at PSFs in a global context has highlighted how these contradictions prevent firms from becoming truly global in nature. What it takes to make partner in the Big 4 is at the core of such interrogations because partners belong to global firms yet are promoted at the national level. We undertake a cross-country comparison of partner promotion processes in Big 4 PSFs in Canada, France, Spain and the UK. Synthesizing existing institutionalist work with Bourdieusian theory, our results suggest that PSFs in different countries resemble each other very closely in terms of the requirements demanded of their partners. Although heterogeneity can be observed in the way in which different forms of capital are converted into each other, we show there is an overall homogeneity in that economic capital hurdles are the most significant, if not the sole, set of criteria upon which considerations of partnership admissions are based.