Beyebach, Mark
Loading...
Email Address
person.page.identifierURI
Birth Date
Job Title
Last Name
Beyebach
First Name
Mark
person.page.departamento
Ciencias de la Salud
person.page.instituteName
ORCID
person.page.observainves
person.page.upna
Name
- Publications
- item.page.relationships.isAdvisorOfPublication
- item.page.relationships.isAdvisorTFEOfPublication
- item.page.relationships.isAuthorMDOfPublication
2 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Publication Open Access Bibliometric differences between WEIRD and non-WEIRD countries in the outcome research on Solution-Focused Brief Therapy(Frontiers Media, 2021) Beyebach, Mark; Neipp López, María del Carmen; Solanes-Puchol, Ángel; Martín-del-Río, Beatriz; Ciencias de la Salud; Osasun ZientziakSolution Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) developed in parallel to Positive Psychology, as a type of intervention that also emphasizes the strengths and resources of clients. The aim of this study was to examine the development of outcome research on SFBT and to determine whether it is predominantly carried out in Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic (WEIRD) countries. A literature review was conducted using a bibliometric methodology, identifying: (a) authors and countries, (b) time trends, (c) language of publications; (d) and journals; (e) samples on which they were tested; (f) characteristics of interventions; and (g) main study designs. A total of 365 original outcome research articles published in scientific journals on solution-focused interventions were extracted. The results show that outcome research on SFBT has grown steadily over the last three decades. Although it started in WEIRD countries, the number of outcome research publications generated in non-WEIRD countries is now higher. There is little international collaboration and, although English is the main language of publication in WEIRD countries, English, Chinese and Parsi predominate in non-WEIRD countries. Productivity is low and most authors have only published one paper. The journals that have published the most papers have a very diverse visibility. The tested interventions are conducted both in clinical and non-clinical samples; mostly in individual and group format; face-to-face; and not only in the form of psychotherapy, but also as coaching and school interventions. Almost half of the publications are randomized controlled trials. The results confirm the wide applicability of SFBT as a single or main component of psychosocial interventions. They support the claim that solution-focused interventions are not a WEIRD practice, but a global practice.Publication Open Access IMPACT of nurses' solution-focused communication on the fluid adherence of adult patients on haemodialysis(Wiley, 2018) Beyebach, Mark; Neipp López, María del Carmen; García Moreno, Maite; González Sánchez, Inés; Ciencias de la Salud; Osasun ZientziakAim: to test the hypothesis that fluid adherence in patients on haemodialysis can be improved through nurses′ solution‐focused communication with patients on issues of adherence. Background: adherence to fluid‐intake restrictions is low in patients on haemodialysis, creating serious health risks. Psychosocial interventions to increase adherence have typically focused on patients and ignored patient/staff interactions. Design: this is a single‐group, pre‐post pilot study registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03432988). Method: a 1‐month baseline of interdialytic weight gain was taken in April 2016 for a group of 36 adult patients in a hospital haemodialysis unit. Then, the nurses of the unit received a 4 hr training in solution‐focused communication on issues of fluid adherence and applied it with the patients of the sample. Interdialytic weight gains were measured during another month. One month after the training, in October 2016, interdialytic weight gains were measured for another month. Results: after introducing solution‐focused communication on fluid adherence, patients′ average interdialytic weight gains decreased significantly, below the level considered indicative of problematic adherence. These results were maintained at follow‐up. Conclusions: our results suggest that a novel approach to adherence, nurses′ solution‐focused communication with patients on haemodialysis, may improve patients′ adherence to fluid restriction. More rigorous, controlled studies are required to confirm long‐term benefits and to understand the causal mechanisms that may underlie the effectiveness of this intervention.