(Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2024) Ferraz Torres, Marta; Sancho Sena, Elena; Corcuera Martínez, María Inés; Martínez-García, Óscar; Suárez Mier, María Belén; Ciencias de la Salud; Osasun Zientziak; Ingeniería Eléctrica, Electrónica y de Comunicación; Ingeniaritza Elektrikoa, Elektronikoa eta Telekomunikazio Ingeniaritza
Studies have not demonstrated the effectiveness of the different types of dressings in reducing the rate of complications. The purpose of this study was to determine which type of dressing is most beneficial in reducing the rate of complications. A total of 281 patients requiring a peripheral intravenous catheter were randomized to receive partially reinforced dressings or fully reinforced dressings (dressings with integral catheter securement). Patients were followed throughout their entire catheter course, and complications included infection, occlusion, phlebitis, accidental dislodgement, extravasation, and medical adhesive-related skin injury. Catheter outcome data were compared to determine whether statistically significant differences existed between the 2 groups. The groups had equivalent demographic characteristics and catheter indications. The average securement time with partially reinforced dressings was 2.72 days, and that for fully reinforced dressings was 2.64 days. However, catheters secured with fully reinforced dressings were associated with fewer total complications, such as infectious phlebitis (P = .043) and accidental dislodgement (P = .03). The fully reinforced securement device significantly reduced the rate of complications related to accidental dislodgement of the device and cases of infectious phlebitis. The use of fully reinforced dressings could reduce catheter-associated complications and improve the quality of patient care.
