Otim, Timothy

Profile Picture

Email Address

person.page.identifierURI

https://academica-e.unavarra.es/handle/2454/49715

Birth Date

Job Title

Last Name

Otim

First Name

Timothy

person.page.departamento

Estadística, Informática y Matemáticas

person.page.instituteName

ORCID

person.page.observainves

751920

person.page.upna

811692

Name

Filters

20193
Reset filters

Settings

Author: Díez, Luis E. ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationOpen Access
    Impact of body wearable sensor positions on UWB ranging
    (IEEE, 2019) Otim, Timothy; Bahillo, Alfonso; Díez, Luis E.; López Iturri, Peio; Falcone Lanas, Francisco; Ingeniaritza Elektrikoa, Elektronikoaren eta Telekomunikazio Ingeniaritzaren; Institute of Smart Cities - ISC; Ingeniería Eléctrica, Electrónica y de Comunicación
    In recent years, Ultrawideband (UWB) has become a very popular technology for time of flight (TOF) based localization and tracking applications but its human body interactions have not been studied yet extensively. Most UWB systems already proposed for pedestrian ranging have only been individually evaluated for a particular wearable sensor position. It is observed that wearable sensors mounted on or close to the human body can raise line-of-sight (LOS), quasi-line-of-sight (QLOS), and non-line-of-sight (NLOS) scenarios leading to significant ranging errors depending on the relative heading angle (RHA) between the pedestrian, wearable sensor, and anchors. In this paper, it is presented that not only does the ranging error depend on the RHA, but on the position of the wearable sensors on the pedestrian. Seven wearable sensor locations namely, fore-head, hand, chest, wrist, arm, thigh and ankle are evaluated and a fair comparison is made through extensive measurements and experiments in a multipath environment. Using the direction in which the pedestrian is facing, the RHA between the pedestrian, wearable sensor, and anchors is computed. For each wearable sensor location, an UWB ranging error model with respect to the human body shadowing effect is proposed. A final conclusion is drawn that among the aforementioned wearable locations, the fore-head provides the best range estimate because it is able to set low mean range errors of about 20 cm in multipath conditions. The fore-head's performance is followed by the hand, wrist, ankle, arm, thigh, and chest in that order.
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationOpen Access
    FDTD and empirical exploration of human body and UWB radiation interaction on TOF ranging
    (IEEE, 2019) Otim, Timothy; Bahillo, Alfonso; Díez, Luis E.; López Iturri, Peio; Falcone Lanas, Francisco; Ingeniería Eléctrica, Electrónica y de Comunicación; Institute of Smart Cities - ISC; Ingeniaritza Elektrikoa, Elektronikoaren eta Telekomunikazio Ingeniaritzaren
    In time-of-flight (TOF)-based human ranging systems, target sensors are often mounted on or close to the human body, which may raise non-line-of-sight (NLOS) cases and lead to significant ranging errors depending on the relative position between the body, transmitter (Tx), and receiver (Rx). In recent years, ultrawideband (UWB) has become a very popular technology for human TOF ranging, but its human body interactions have not been studied yet extensively. In this letter, the UWB and human body interaction is explored by the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) technique, and the obtained E-field strength variation results are validated by means of commercially available UWB kits. Additionally, an UWB-ranging error model with respect to the human body shadowing effect is proposed and evaluated by extensive measurements, i.e., in indoor environments, line-of-sight (LOS) and NLOS are found to be well modeled by Gaussian and Gamma distributions, respectively, while in outdoor fields, LOS and NLOS are both modeled by Gaussian distributions. The main conclusion of this study is that there is a clear pattern between a gain in the E-field strength and TOF ranging errors. It can be established that in a worst-case scenario, a gain of 4–18 dB is observed, which corresponds to about 30–60 cm of TOF ranging errors.
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationOpen Access
    Effects of the body wearable sensor position on the UWB localization accuracy
    (MDPI, 2019) Otim, Timothy; Díez, Luis E.; Bahillo, Alfonso; López Iturri, Peio; Falcone Lanas, Francisco; Ingeniaritza Elektrikoa, Elektronikoaren eta Telekomunikazio Ingeniaritzaren; Institute of Smart Cities - ISC; Ingeniería Eléctrica, Electrónica y de Comunicación
    Over the years, several Ultrawideband (UWB) localization systems have been proposed and evaluated for accurate estimation of the position for pedestrians. However, most of them are evaluated for a particular wearable sensor position; hence, the accuracy obtained is subject to a given wearable sensor position. This paper is focused on studying the effects of body wearable sensor positions i.e., chest, arm, ankle, wrist, thigh, forehead, and hand, on the localization accuracy. According to our results, the forehead and the chest provide the best and worst body sensor location for tracking a pedestrian, respectively. With the wearable sensor at the forehead and chest position, errors lower than 0.35 m (90th percentile) and 4 m can be obtained, respectively. The reason for such a contrast in the performance lies in the fact that, in non-line-of-sight (NLOS) situations, the chest generates the highest multipath of any part of the human body. Thus, the large errors obtained arise due to the signal arriving at the target wearable sensor by multiple reflections from interacting objects in the environment rather than by direct line-of-sight (LOS) or creeping wave propagation mechanism.