Navajas León, Alberto
Loading...
Email Address
person.page.identifierURI
Birth Date
Job Title
Last Name
Navajas León
First Name
Alberto
person.page.departamento
Ciencias
person.page.instituteName
InaMat2. Instituto de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados y Matemáticas
ORCID
person.page.observainves
person.page.upna
Name
- Publications
- item.page.relationships.isAdvisorOfPublication
- item.page.relationships.isAdvisorTFEOfPublication
- item.page.relationships.isAuthorMDOfPublication
3 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Publication Open Access A techno-economic and life cycle assessment for the production of green methanol from CO2: catalyst and process bottlenecks(Elsevier, 2022) Cordero-Lanzac, Tomas; Ramirez, Adrián; Navajas León, Alberto; Gevers, Lieven; Brunialti, Sirio; Gandía Pascual, Luis; Aguayo, Andrés T.; Sarathy, S. Mani; Gascon, Jorge; Zientziak; Institute for Advanced Materials and Mathematics - INAMAT2; Ciencias; Universidad Pública de Navarra / Nafarroako Unibertsitate PublikoaThe success of catalytic schemes for the large-scale valorization of CO2 does not only depend on the development of active, selective and stable catalytic materials but also on the overall process design. Here we present a multidisciplinary study (from catalyst to plant and techno-economic/lifecycle analysis) for the production of green methanol from renewable H2 and CO2. We combine an in-depth kinetic analysis of one of the most promising recently reported methanol-synthesis catalysts (InCo) with a thorough process simulation and techno-economic assessment. We then perform a life cycle assessment of the simulated process to gauge the real environmental impact of green methanol production from CO2. Our results indicate that up to 1.75 ton of CO2 can be abated per ton of produced methanol only if renewable energy is used to run the process, while the sensitivity analysis suggest that either rock-bottom H2 prices (1.5 $ kg−1) or severe CO2 taxation (300 $ per ton) are needed for a profitable methanol plant. Besides, we herein highlight and analyze some critical bottlenecks of the process. Especial attention has been paid to the contribution of H2 to the overall plant costs, CH4 trace formation, and purity and costs of raw gases. In addition to providing important information for policy makers and industrialists, directions for catalyst (and therefore process) improvements are outlined.Publication Open Access Life cycle assessment of wheat straw pyrolysis with volatile fractions chemical looping combustion(MDPI, 2024) Mendiara, Teresa; Navajas León, Alberto; Abad, Alberto; Pröll, Tobias; Munárriz Tabuenca, Mikel; Gandía Pascual, Luis; García-Labiano, Francisco; Diego, Luis F. de; Ciencias; Zientziak; Institute for Advanced Materials and Mathematics - INAMAT2Among the approaches to facilitating negative CO2 emissions is biochar production. Biochar is generated in the pyrolysis of certain biomasses. In the pyrolysis process, carbon in the biomass is turned into a solid, porous, carbon-rich, and stable material that can be captured from the soil after a period of from a few decades to several centuries. In addition to this long-term carbon sequestration role, biochar is also beneficial for soil performance as it helps to restore soil fertility and improves the retention and diffusion of water and nutrients. This work presents a Life Cycle Assessment of different pyrolysis approaches for biochar production. Biomass pyrolysis is performed in a fixed-bed reactor, which operates at a mild temperature (550 °C). Biochar is obtained as solid product of the pyrolysis, but there are also liquid (bio-oil) and gaseous products (syngas). The pyrolysis gas is partly used to fulfil the energy demand of the pyrolysis process, which is highly endothermic. In the conventional approach, CO2 is produced during the combustion of syngas and emitted to the atmosphere. Another approach to facilitate CO2 capture and thus obtain more negative CO2 emissions in the pyrolysis process is burning syngas and bio-oil in a Chemical Looping Combustion unit. Life Cycle Assessment was performed of these approaches toward biomass pyrolysis to evaluate their environmental impact. The Chemical Looping Combustion approach significantly reduced the values of 7 of the 16 environmental impact indicators studied, along with the Global Warming Potential among them, it slightly increased the value of one indicator related to the use of fossil resources, and it maintained the values of the remaining 8 indicators. Environmental impact reduction occurs due to the avoidance of CO2 and NOx emissions with Chemical Looping Combustion. The CO2 balances of the different pyrolysis approaches with Chemical Looping Combustion configurations were compared with a base case, which constituted the direct combustion of wheat straw to obtain thermal energy. Direct biomass combustion for the production of 17.1 MJ of thermal energy had CO2 positive emissions of 0.165 kg. If the gaseous fraction was burned by Chemical Looping Combustion, CO2 was captured and the emissions became increasingly negative, until a value of -3.30 kg/17.1 MJ was generated. If bio-oil was also burned by this technology, the negative trend of CO2 emissions continued, until they reached a value of -3.66 kg.Publication Open Access Mesoporous Sn-in-MCM-41 catalysts for the selective sugar conversion to methyl lactate and comparative life cycle assessment with the biochemical process(American Chemical Society, 2022) Iglesia, Óscar de la; Sarango, Miryan; Munárriz Tabuenca, Mikel; Malankowska, Magdalena; Navajas León, Alberto; Gandía Pascual, Luis; Coronas, Joaquín; Téllez, Carlos; Ciencias; Zientziak; Universidad Pública de Navarra / Nafarroako Unibertsitate PublikoaThe use of biomass for the production of energy and higher added value products is a topic of increasing interest in line with growing environmental concerns and circular economy. Mesoporous material Sn-In-MCM-41 was synthesized for the first time and used as a catalyst for the transformation of sugars to methyl lactate (ML). This catalyst was characterized in depth by various techniques and compared with Sn-MCM-41 and In-MCM-41 catalysts. In the new Sn-In-MCM-41 material, both metals, homogeneously distributed throughout the mesoporous structure of MCM-41, actuate in a cooperative way in the different steps of the reaction mechanism. As a result, yields to ML of 69.4 and 73.9% in the transformation of glucose and sucrose were respectively reached. In the case of glucose, the ML yield 1.5 and 2.6 times higher than those of Sn-MCM-41 and In-MCM-41 catalysts, respectively. The Sn-In-MCM-41 catalyst was reused in the transformation of glucose up to four cycles without significant loss of catalytic activity. Finally, life cycle assessment comparison between chemical and biochemical routes to produce ML allowed us to conclude that the use of Sn-In-MCM-41 reduces the environmental impacts compared to Sn-MCM-41. Nevertheless, to make the chemical route comparable to the biochemical one, improvements in the catalyst and ML synthesis have to be achieved.