Open Access
Gaseous fueling of an adapted commercial automotive spark-ignition engine: simplified thermodynamic modeling and experimental study running on hydrogen, methane, carbon monoxide and their mixtures
(Elsevier, 2023) Urroz Unzueta, José Carlos; Diéguez Elizondo, Pedro; Arzamendi Manterola, Gurutze; Arana Burgui, Miguel; Gandía Pascual, Luis; Ingeniería; Ingeniaritza; Institute for Advanced Materials and Mathematics - INAMAT2; Ciencias; Zientziak; Universidad Pública de Navarra / Nafarroako Unibertsitate Publikoa
In the present work, methane, carbon monoxide, hydrogen and the binary mixtures 20 % CH4–80 % H2, 80 % CH4–20 % H2, 25 % CO–75 % H2 (by volume) were considered as fuels of a naturally aspirated port-fuel injection four-cylinder Volkswagen 1.4 L spark-ignition (SI) engine. The interest in these fuels lies in the fact that they can be obtained from renewable resources such as the fermentation or gasification of residual biomasses as well as the electrolysis of water with electricity of renewable origin in the case of hydrogen. In addition, they can be used upon relatively easy modifications of the engines, including the retrofitting of existing internal combustion engines. It has been found that the engine gives similar performance regardless the gaseous fuel nature if the air–fuel equivalence ratio (λ) is the same. Maximum brake torque and mean effective pressure values within 45–89 N⋅m and 4.0–8.0 bar, respectively, have been obtained at values of λ between 1 and 2 at full load, engine speed of 2000 rpm and optimum spark-advance. In contrast, the nature of the gaseous fuel had great influence upon the range of λ values at which a fuel (either pure or blend) could be used. Methane and methane-rich mixtures with hydrogen or carbon monoxide allowed operating the engine at close to stoichiometric conditions (i.e. 1 < λ < 1.5) yielding the highest brake torque and mean effective pressure values. On the contrary, hydrogen and hydrogen-rich mixtures with methane or carbon monoxide could be employed only in the very fuel-lean region (i.e. 1.5 < λ < 2). The behavior of carbon monoxide was intermediate between that of methane and hydrogen. The present study extends and complements previous works in which the aforementioned fuels were compared only under stoichiometric conditions in air (λ = 1). In addition, a simple zero-dimensional thermodynamic combustion model has been developed that allows describing qualitatively the trends set by the several fuels. Although the model is useful to understand the influence of the fuels properties on the engine performance, its predictive capability is limited by the simplifications made.
Open Access
Conversion of a gasoline engine-generator set to a bi-fuel (hydrogen/gasoline) electronic fuel-injected power unit
(Elsevier, 2011) Sáinz Casas, David; Diéguez Elizondo, Pedro; Urroz Unzueta, José Carlos; Sopena Serna, Carlos; Guelbenzu, E.; Pérez Ezcurdia, Amaya; Benito Amurrio, Marta; Marcelino Sádaba, Sara; Arzamendi Manterola, Gurutze; Gandía Pascual, Luis; Ingeniería; Ingeniaritza
The modifications performed to convert a gasoline carbureted engine-generator set to a bi-fuel (hydrogen/gasoline) electronic fuel-injected power unit are described. Main changes affected the gasoline and gas injectors, the injector seats on the existing inlet manifold, camshaft and crankshaft wheels with their corresponding Hall sensors, throttle position and oil temperature sensors as well as the electronic management unit. When working on gasoline, the engine-generator set was able to provide up to 8 kW of continuous electric power (10 kW peak power), whereas working on hydrogen it provided up to 5 kW of electric power at an engine speed of 3000 rpm. The air-to-fuel equivalence ratio (λ) was adjusted to stoichiometric (λ = 1) for gasoline. In contrast, when using hydrogen the engine worked ultra-lean (λ = 3) in the absence of connected electric load and richer as the load increased. Comparisons of the fuel consumptions and pollutant emissions running on gasoline and hydrogen were performed at the same engine speed and electric loads between 1 and 5 kW. The specific fuel consumption was much lower with the engine running on hydrogen than on gasoline. At 5 kW of load up to 26% of thermal efficiency was reached with hydrogen whereas only 20% was achieved with the engine running on gasoline. Regarding the NOx emissions, they were low, of the order of 30 ppm for loads below 4 kW for the engine-generator set working on hydrogen. The bi-fuel engine is very reliable and the required modifications can be performed without excessive difficulties thus allowing taking advantage of the well-established existing fabrication processes of internal combustion engines looking to speed up the implementation of the energetic uses of hydrogen.

Arzamendi Manterola, Gurutze

Email Address

person.page.identifierURI

Birth Date

Job Title

Last Name

First Name

person.page.departamento

person.page.instituteName

ORCID

person.page.observainves

person.page.upna

Name

Filters

Author

Subject

Date

Has files

Item Type

Type

Settings

Sort By

Results per page

Search Results