Urrutia Vera, Olaia

Profile Picture

Email Address

person.page.identifierURI

https://academica-e.unavarra.es/handle/2454/50126

Birth Date

Job Title

Last Name

Urrutia Vera

First Name

Olaia

person.page.departamento

Agronomía, Biotecnología y Alimentación

person.page.instituteName

IS-FOOD. Research Institute on Innovation & Sustainable Development in Food Chain

ORCID

0000-0003-4701-4314

person.page.observainves

88808

person.page.upna

810905

Name

Filters

20211
Reset filters

Settings

Subject: Image analysis ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationOpen Access
    Predicting beef carcass fatness using an image analysis system
    (MDPI, 2021) Mendizábal Aizpuru, José Antonio; Ripoll, Guillermo; Urrutia Vera, Olaia; Insausti Barrenetxea, Kizkitza; Soret Lafraya, Beatriz; Arana Navarro, Ana; Institute on Innovation and Sustainable Development in Food Chain - ISFOOD
    The amount and distribution of subcutaneous fat is an important factor affecting beef carcass quality. The degree of fatness is determined by visual assessments scored on a scale of five fatness levels (the SEUROP system). New technologies such as the image analysis method have been developed and applied in an effort to enhance the accuracy and objectivity of this classification system. In this study, 50 young bulls were slaughtered (570 ± 52.5 kg) and after slaughter the carcasses were weighed (360 ± 33.1 kg) and a SEUROP system fatness score assigned. A digital picture of the outer surface of the left side of the carcass was taken and the area of fat cover (fat area) was measured using an image analysis system. Commercial cutting of the carcasses was performed 24 h post-mortem. The fat trimmed away on cutting (cutting fat) was weighed. A regression analysis was carried out for the carcass cutting fat (y-axis) on the carcass fat area (x-axis) to establish the accuracy of the image analysis system. A greater accuracy was obtained by the image analysis (R2 = 0.72; p < 0.001) than from the visual fatness scores (R2 = 0.66; p > 0.001). These results show the image analysis to be more accurate than the visual assessment system for predicting beef carcass fatness.