Publication:
The effects of using collaborative writing vs. peer review treatments on subsequent individual writings

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorTFEBueno-Alastuey, María Camino
dc.contributor.affiliationFacultad de Ciencias Humanas y Socialeses_ES
dc.contributor.affiliationGiza eta Gizarte Zientzien Fakultateaeu
dc.contributor.authorRodero Albaiceta, Seila
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-25T14:01:33Z
dc.date.available2023-07-01T23:00:12Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.updated2018-10-22T10:35:22Z
dc.description.abstractPrevious researches have investigated separately the effects of collaborative writing and peer review. However, to the best of the author’s knowledge, there has not been any research comparing both approaches. This study is aimed to analyse the effects of two treatments, collaborative writing and peer review on individual writing, on a subsequent individually written production in terms of fluency, lexical variety, accuracy and complexity. A total of 29 students of lower-intermediate level took part in this study, 16 in the collaborative writing group and 13 in the peer review group. The students wrote a total of 3 compositions using a news article format from which the pre-test and the post-test writings were analysed following a quantitative and a holistic analysis. The results suggest that students who had received collaborative writing as a treatment produced longer writings and used more complex language, while those who carried out peer review in the treatment session improved their final individual writing in terms of lexical variety and accuracy. The implications of these results are discussed.en
dc.description.degreeMáster Universitario en Profesorado de Educación Secundaria por la Universidad Pública de Navarraes_ES
dc.description.degreeBigarren Hezkuntzako Irakasletzako Unibertsitate Masterra Nafarroako Unibertsitate Publikoaneu
dc.embargo.lift2023-07-01
dc.embargo.terms2023-07-01
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.urihttps://academica-e.unavarra.es/handle/2454/31203
dc.language.isoengen
dc.rights.accessRightsAcceso abierto / Sarbide irekiaes
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectCollaborative writingen
dc.subjectPeer reviewen
dc.subjectFluencyen
dc.subjectLexical varietyen
dc.subjectAccuracyen
dc.subjectComplexityen
dc.subjectEFLen
dc.titleThe effects of using collaborative writing vs. peer review treatments on subsequent individual writingsen
dc.typeTrabajo Fin de Máster/Master Amaierako Lanaes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisen
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
TFM18-MPES-ING-RODERO-119951.pdf
Size:
664.55 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.78 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Trabajos Fin de Máster FCHS - GGZF Master Amaierako Lanak
Trabajos Fin de Máster - Master Amaierako Lanak