Sola Torralba, IonGonzález de Audícana Amenábar, MaríaÁlvarez-Mozos, Jesús2016-10-272018-10-0120160034-4257 (Print)1879-0704 (Electronic)10.1016/j.rse.2016.07.002https://academica-e.unavarra.es/handle/2454/22503Incluye 1 fichero de datosIn the last decades, several topographic correction methods (TOC) have been proposed, but there is not an agreement on the best method. Furthermore, different evaluation criteria have been used in the past, and there is not any simple and objective evaluation procedure to measure the quality of the correction. Consequently, a multicriteria analysis of widely used topographic correction methods is required that evaluates their performance over different sensors, terrain and temporal configurations. In this work, ten TOC methods were assessed using seven different evaluation strategies. The analysis was carried out for three SPOT5 images acquired over a mountainous area of northern Spain. The images had different acquisition dates and solar angles, so as to evaluate performance under varying illumination conditions. The results obtained showed that Statistic-Empiricalmethod, CCorrection and Sun-Canopy-Sensor+C performed the best, and differences were minor when favorable illumination conditions were considered. For the seven tested evaluation strategies, interquartile range reduction of land covers or the comparison of sunlit and shaded slopes gave very similar results, whereas there were greater contrasts among other criteria.application/pdfapplication/zipeng© 2016 Elsevier B.V. The manuscript version is made available under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.Topographic correctionEvaluationComparisonMulti-criteriaArtículo / ArtikuluaAcceso abierto / Sarbide irekiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess