Arango Lasprilla, Juan CarlosAyearst, Lindsay E.Rivera, DiegoDini, Mia E.Olabarrieta Landa, LaieneRamos Usuga, DanielaPerrin, Paul B.McCaffrey, Robert2025-02-252024-11-05Arango-Lasprilla, J. C., Ayearst, L. E., Rivera, D., Dini, M. E., Olabarrieta-Landa, L., Ramos-Usuga, D., Perrin, P. B., McCaffrey, R. (2024). Test of memory malingering 2nd edition: normative data from cognitively intact adults living in Spain. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2421450.2327-909510.1080/23279095.2024.2421450https://academica-e.unavarra.es/handle/2454/53561This study evaluated the universality of the TOMM 2 and provided a reference sample of cognitively intact adults living in Spain whose native language was Spanish. A total of 203 adults completed the TOMM 2 from June 2019 to January 2020. When using the original TOMM cutoff scores derived from English speakers, all participants scored in a range that would suggest that they passed the TOMM. When using a cut score less than 40 on Trial 1, only one participant in this study would be mistakenly classified as providing an invalid performance. Spanish-speaking adults in Spain from this study achieved a perfect score on Trial 1 at a rate more than double that of English-speaking individuals on the original TOMM. At the item level, all but one item met the minimum standard for performance validity; this item fell only marginally below the standard at 89%. This study found a very low failure rate for the TOMM 2, suggesting that the second edition has at least as high specificity as the original in Spanish adults.application/pdfeng© 2024 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. It is deposited under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial LicenseMalingeringMeuropsychological assessmentPerformance validityTest of memory malingering, 2nd editioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article2025-02-25info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess