Wouters, SebastienCrucifix, MichelSinnesael, MatthiasSilva, Anne-Christine daZeeden, ChristianZivanovic, MiroslavBoulvain, FrédéricDevleeschouwer, Xabier2022-04-262023-12-1420220012-825210.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103894https://academica-e.unavarra.es/handle/2454/42797Sedimentary rocks can record signals produced byhighly complex processes. These signals are generated by a progressive deposition of sediments which can be affected, mainly through the climate system, by regular astronomical cycles (i.e. Milankovitch cycles), and by irregular oscillations like the El Niño-Southern Oscillation. Also, usually through biological, chemical and/or physical post-depositional processes,thesedimentary records can be affected by pattern-creating heterogeneous processes. The noise in the signals further complicates the records,and the deposition rate (or sedimentation rate) can fluctuate, which greatly reduces the effectiveness of the classical stationary time-series analysis methods commonly used in cyclostratigraphy (i.e.the study of the cycles found inthe sedimentary records). Faced with this multiplicity of processes, a common approach used in cyclostratigraphy is to reduce each signal to more manageable sub-signals, either over a given range of frequencies (e.g.,by filtering), or by considering a continuum of constant frequencies (e.g.,using transforms). This makes it possible to focus on the features of interest, commonly astronomical cycles. However, working with sub-signals is not trivial. Firstly, sub-signals have a certain amount of cross-cancellation when they are summed back to reconstructthe initial signal. This means that in filters and in transforms, wiggles that are not present in the initial signal can appear in the sub-signals. Secondly, the sub-signals considered often cannot be summed to reconstruct the initial signal: this means that there are processes affecting the signal which remain unstudied. It is possible to takecross-cancellation into accountand to consider the entire content of a signal by dividing the signal into a decomposition: a set of sub-signals that can be added back together to reconstruct the original signal. We discusshere how to reframe commonly used time-series analysis techniques in the context of decomposition, how they are affected by cross-cancellation, and how adequate they are for comprehending the whole signals. We also show that decomposition can be carried out by non-stationary time-series methods, which can mini misecross-cancellation, and have now reached sufficient maturity to tackle sedimentary records signals. We present novel tools to adapt non-stationary decomposition for cyclostratigraphic purposes, based on the concepts of Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) and Instantaneous Frequency (IF), mainly: (1) afast Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD) algorithm, (2) quality metrics for decomposition, and (3) plots to visualise instantaneous frequency, amplitude and frequency ratio. We illustrate the use of these tolos by applying them on a grey scale signal from the site of the Ocean Drilling Program, at Ceara Rise (western equatorial Atlantic), especially to identifyand characterisethe expression of astronomical cycles. The main goal is to show that by minimising cross-cancellation, we can apply in real signalswhat we call the wiggle-in-signal approach: making the sub-signals in the decomposition more representative of the expression, wiggle by wiggle, of all the processes affecting the signal(e.g., astronomical cycles). We finally argue that decomposition could be used as a practical standard output for time-series analysis interpretation of cyclostratigraphic signals.68 p.application/pdfapplication/zipeng© 2021 Elsevier B.V. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0CyclostratigraphyAstrochronologySignal DecompositionEnsemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD)A decomposition approach to cyclostratigraphic signal processinginfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcceso abierto / Sarbide irekia