Show simple item record

dc.creatorFernández-Montalvo, Javieres_ES
dc.creatorLópez-Goñi, José Javieres_ES
dc.creatorArteaga Olleta, Alfonsoes_ES
dc.creatorHaro Escribano, Begoñaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-10T12:43:39Z
dc.date.available2020-09-09T23:00:16Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1097-9891 (Electronic)
dc.identifier.issn1097-9891 (Electronic)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2454/34789
dc.descriptionThis is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse on 09 Sep 2019, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2019.1660886en
dc.description.abstractBackground: Few studies have analyzed the specific characteristics related to uni/bidirectional intimate partner violence (IPV) in patients with addiction problems. Knowing the specific profiles of these patients would allow the development of effective tailored interventions. Objective: This study assessed gender differences in unidirectional and bidirectional IPV among patients undergoing drug addiction treatment. Method: We sampled 122 patients (91 male and 31 female) who sought treatment in an addiction treatment center, and collected cross-sectional self-reported data on violent behaviors (physical, sexual and psychological violence), sociodemographic factors, distorted thoughts about women and violence, impulsiveness, and anger. Results: Ninety-one percent of participants reported experience of IPV (any type and any direction). Sixty-three percent of participants reported bidirectional violence, which was more common among women (83.9%) than men (56.1%). Unidirectional (perpetration only) IPV was reported in 28.7% of participants, and it was more common among men (34.1%) than women (12.9%). No one reported unidirectional (victimization-only) IPV. When only physical and/or sexual violence was considered, bidirectional violence affected 32.0% of the sample; 23.8% were only victims, and 3.3% were only perpetrators (all of them men). Participants who reported bidirectional violence had higher scores for impulsiveness, anger, and distorted thoughts. Conclusions: Bidirectional IPV is commonly reported among patients seeking treatment for addiction, particularly among women, and should be considered in future research and clinical practice.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project was supported by a grant (code PSI2016–76511- R) from the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) of the Spanish Government and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional of the European Union (FEDER, EU).en
dc.format.extent28 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen
dc.relation.ispartofThe American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 2019en
dc.subjectDrug addictionen
dc.subjectIntimate partner violenceen
dc.subjectGenderen
dc.subjectBidirectional violenceen
dc.subjectPrevalenceen
dc.subjectAlcohol use disorderen
dc.subjectSubstance use disorderen
dc.titleGender differences in unidirectional and bidirectional intimate partner violence in addictionsen
dc.typeArtículo / Artikuluaes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversidad Pública de Navarra. Departamento de Ciencias de la Saludes_ES
dc.contributor.departmentNafarroako Unibertsitate Publikoa. Osasun Zientziak Sailaeu
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.rights.accessRightsAcceso abierto / Sarbide irekiaes
dc.embargo.terms2020-09-09
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00952990.2019.1660886
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/1PE/PSI2016–76511-Ren
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2019.1660886
dc.type.versionVersión aceptada / Onetsi den bertsioaes
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record