Nutritional status and physical performance using handgrip and SPPB tests in hospitalized older adults

View/ Open
Date
2021Author
Version
Acceso abierto / Sarbide irekia
Type
Artículo / Artikulua
Version
Versión aceptada / Onetsi den bertsioa
Impact
|
10.1016/j.clnu.2021.09.034
Abstract
Background & aims: Malnutrition and poor physical performance are highly prevalent within hospitalized older adults, and both have in common the loss of muscle mass. Likewise, there is growing interest in identifying markers of physical performance, other than just measuring muscle mass, that might be useful for managing malnutrition. This study aimed to (i) characterize the physical condition of ...
[++]
Background & aims: Malnutrition and poor physical performance are highly prevalent within hospitalized older adults, and both have in common the loss of muscle mass. Likewise, there is growing interest in identifying markers of physical performance, other than just measuring muscle mass, that might be useful for managing malnutrition. This study aimed to (i) characterize the physical condition of hospitalized older adults in comparison to previously published reference percentile values of same age adults and (ii) to examine the association between the nutritional status and physical performance of older inpatients. Methods: A total of 604 inpatients (age 84.3 ± 6.8 years, 50.3% women) participated in this cross-sectional study. Patients were assessed for nutritional status (Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF)) and physical performance (handgrip strength and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)). Results: During hospitalization, 65.7% of the inpatients were at risk of malnutrition or malnourished. More than a half of the older inpatients were unfit (≤P25) for handgrip strength (52.0%) and SPPB total score (86.3%) as well as for two of its subtests, gait speed (86.7%) and 5 times sit-to-stand (91.1%) tests. Patients' nutritional status was significantly associated with better physical performance within all tests (all p < 0.001), as their nutritional status improved so did their physical performance (all p for trend <0.001). Hence, being at risk of malnutrition or malnourished significantly increased the likelihood for being classified as unfit according to handgrip strength (OR: 1.466, 95% CI: 1.045–2.056), SPPB total score (OR: 2.553, 95% CI: 1.592–4.094) and 4-m walking test (OR: 4.049, 95% CI: 2.469–6.640) (all p < 0.05), and as frail (OR: 4.675, 95% CI: 2.812–7.772) according to the SPPB frailty threshold (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study reinforces the use of handgrip strength and SPPB, as well as its subtests (gait speed and 5 times sit-to-stand tests), in hospitalized older adults as alternative measures of muscle mass for malnutrition management. Hence, it seems that risk of malnutrition or malnutrition assessed by MNA-SF might help to predict poor physical performance in older inpatients. [--]
Subject
Handgrip,
Inpatient,
Malnutrition,
Muscle strength,
Older adults,
Physical performance
Publisher
Elsevier
Published in
Clinical Nutrition, 40 (2021), 5547-5555
Departament
Universidad Pública de Navarra / Nafarroako Unibertsitate Publikoa. ISFOOD - Institute for Innovation and Sustainable Development in Food Chain
Publisher version
Sponsorship
This study was supported by the Basque Government ( 2016111138 ). Maria Amasene was supported by a grant from the University of the Basque Country (PIF17/186).