Person:
Loizu Maeztu, Javier

Loading...
Profile Picture

Email Address

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

Loizu Maeztu

First Name

Javier

person.page.departamento

Proyectos e Ingeniería Rural

person.page.instituteName

ORCID

0000-0002-4438-7994

person.page.upna

810783

Name

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • PublicationOpen Access
    Accuracy of methods for field assessment of rill and ephemeral gully erosion
    (Elsevier, 2006) Casalí Sarasíbar, Javier; Loizu Maeztu, Javier; Campo-Bescós, Miguel; Santisteban Comino, Luisa María de; Álvarez Mozos, Jesús; Proyectos e Ingeniería Rural; Landa Ingeniaritza eta Proiektuak
    To properly assess soil erosion in agricultural areas, it is necessary to determine precisely the volume of ephemeral gullies and rills in the field by using direct measurement procedures. However, little information is available on the accuracy of the different methods used. The main purpose of this paper is to provide information for a suitable assessment of rill and ephemeral gully erosion with such direct measurement methods. To achieve this objective: a) the measurement errors associated to three methods used for field assessment of channel cross sectional areas are explored; b) the influence of the number of cross sections used per unit channel length on the assessment accuracy, is analysed and; c) the effect of the channel size and shape on measurement errors is examined. The three methods considered to determine the cross sectional areas were: micro-topographic profile meter (1); detailed measurement of section characteristic lengths with a tape (2); measurement of cross section width and depth with a tape (3). Five reaches of different ephemeral gully types 14.0 or 30.0 m long and a set of six 20.4 to 29.4 m long rill reaches were selected. On each gully reach, the cross sectional areas were measured using the three above mentioned methods, with a separation (s) between cross sections of 1 m. For rills, the cross sectional areas were measured with methods 1 and 3, with s= 2 m. Then, the corresponding total erosion volumes were computed. The volume calculated with method 1 with s= 1 m for gullies and s= 2 m for rills was taken as the reference method. For each channel, and for each one of the possible combinations of s and measurement method (m), the relative measurement error and the absolute value of the relative measurement error (Ersm and |Ersm| ), defined with respect to the reference one, was calculated. |Ersm| much higher than 10% were obtained very easily, even for small s values and for apparently quasi prismatic channels. Channel size and shape had a great influence on measurement errors. In fact, the selection of the more suitable method for a certain gully shape and size seemed to be much more important than s, at least when s< 10 m. Method 1 always provided the most precise measurements, and its results were the less dependent on s. However, s must be <5 m to guarantee an error smaller than 10%. Method 2 is not recommended, because it is difficult, time consuming and can lead to large errors. Method 3 seems to be enough for small, wide and shallow gullies, and for small rills, but only if s is shorter than 5 m. Results obtained after the analysis of rill measurement errors were similar to those of gullies. The analysis of Ersm and |Ersm| when calculating channel volumes using a unique representative cross section highlighted the importance of correctly selecting the adequate cross section. Due to the high error values that this method can entail, it is not considered as advisable whenever accurate erosion measurements are pursued.
  • PublicationOpen Access
    On the assimilation set-up of ASCAT soil moisture data for improving streamflow catchment simulation
    (Elsevier, 2018) Loizu Maeztu, Javier; Massari, Christian; Álvarez Mozos, Jesús; Tarpanelli, Angelica; Brocca, Luca; Casalí Sarasíbar, Javier; Proyectos e Ingeniería Rural; Landa Ingeniaritza eta Proiektuak
    Assimilation of remotely sensed surface soil moisture (SSM) data into hydrological catchment models has been identified as a means to improve stream flow simulations, but reported results vary markedly depending on the particular model, catchment and assimilation procedure used. In this study, the in fluence of key aspects, such as the type of model, re-scaling technique and SSM observation error considered, were evaluated. For this aim, Advanced SCATterometer ASCAT-SSM observations were assimilated through the ensemble Kalman filter into two hydrological models of different complexity namely MISDc and TOPLATS) run on two Mediterranean catchments of similar size (750 km2). Three different re-scaling techniques were evaluated (linear re-scaling, variance matching and cumulative distribution function matching), and SSM observation error values ranging from 0.01% to 20% were considered. Four different efficiency measures were used for evaluating the results. Increases in Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (0.03–0.15) and efficiency indices (10–45%) were obtained, especially when linear re-scaling and observation errors within 4-6% were considered. This study found out that there is a potential to improve stream flow prediction through data assimilation of remotely sensed SSM in catchments of different characteristics and with hydrological models of different conceptualizations schemes, but for that, a careful evaluation of the observation error and re-scaling technique set-up utilized is required.
  • PublicationRestricted
    Aplicación del modelo AnnAGNPS a la cuenca del río Cemborain
    (2007) Loizu Maeztu, Javier; Casalí Sarasíbar, Javier; Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos; Nekazaritza Ingeniarien Goi Mailako Eskola Teknikoa; Proyectos e Ingeniería Rural; Landa Ingeniaritza eta Proiektuak
  • PublicationOpen Access
    Evaluation of TOPLATS on three Mediterranean catchments
    (Elsevier, 2016) Loizu Maeztu, Javier; Álvarez Mozos, Jesús; Casalí Sarasíbar, Javier; Goñi Garatea, Mikel; Proyectos e Ingeniería Rural; Landa Ingeniaritza eta Proiektuak; Universidad Pública de Navarra / Nafarroako Unibertsitate Publikoa
    Physically based hydrological models are complex tools that provide a complete description of the different processes occurring on a catchment. The TOPMODEL-based Land-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (TOPLATS) simulates water and energy balances at different time steps, in both lumped and distributed modes. In order to gain insight on the behavior of TOPLATS and its applicability in different conditions a detailed evaluation needs to be carried out. This study aimed to develop a complete evaluation of TOPLATS including: 1) a detailed review of previous research works using this model; 2) a sensitivity analysis (SA) of the model with two contrasted methods (Morris and Sobol) of different complexity; 3) a 4-step calibration strategy based on a multi-start Powell optimization algorithm; and 4) an analysis of the influence of simulation time step (hourly vs. daily). The model was applied on three catchments of varying size (La Tejeria, Cidacos and Arga), located in Navarre (Northern Spain), and characterized by different levels of Mediterranean climate influence. Both Morris and Sobol methods showed very similar results that identified Brooks-Corey Pore Size distribution Index (B), Bubbling pressure (ψc) and Hydraulic conductivity decay (f) as the three overall most influential parameters in TOPLATS. After calibration and validation, adequate streamflow simulations were obtained in the two wettest catchments, but the driest (Cidacos) gave poor results in validation, due to the large climatic variability between calibration and validation periods. To overcome this issue, an alternative random and discontinuous method of cal/val period selection was implemented, improving model results.
  • PublicationOpen Access
    Evaluation of the improvement of streamflow prediction through the assimilation of remotely sensed soil moisture observations
    (2017) Loizu Maeztu, Javier; Álvarez-Mozos, Jesús; Casalí Sarasíbar, Javier; Proyectos e Ingeniería Rural; Landa Ingeniaritza eta Proiektuak
    El objetivo principal de esta tesis es evaluar si la asimilacion de datos de humedad superficial del suelo obtenidos mediante tecnicas de teledeteccion, en modelos hidrologicos es capaz de mejorar la prediccion de caudales en los rios a la salida de las cuencas. Este objetivo general se concreta en los siguientes objetivos especificos: 1) evaluar la respuesta de modelos de diferente configuracion espacial (agregados, semi-distribuidos, distribuidos), a la asimilacion de datos, con el fin de conseguir una mejora en la simulacion de caudales; 2) evaluar la influencia de las caracteristicas de cada cuenca (como tamano, topografia, clima o usos del suelo) en los resultados de la asimilacion de datos; 3) evaluar la posible mejora obtenida en la simulacion de escorrentia mediante la asimilacion de datos de sensores como ASCAT o SMOS, que observan diferentes frecuencias (banda C y banda L); 4) evaluar la mejora en la prediccion de escorrentia al asimilar en un modelo distribuido el producto de alta resolucion (1-km) desarrollado en el Barcelona Expert Center y obtenido a partir de los datos de los satelites SMOS y MODIS; 5) evaluar la influencia que las diferentes tecnicas de re-escalado de la informacion observada tienen sobre los resultados de la asimilacion, y por ultimo; 6) evaluar la influencia que tiene sobre los resultados de la asimilacion el valor de error de observacion atribuido a cada satelite. Un segundo objetivo de esta tesis es la evaluacion del modelo TOPLATS como herramienta de simulacion de caudales en cuencas Mediterraneas, y se concreto en los siguientes objetivos especificos: 1) llevar a cabo una revision bibliografica en profundidad de los diferentes trabajos desarrollados con TOPLATS anteriormente, con especial atencion a aquellos en los que se trabajo en la calibracion del modelo y en el analisis de sus diferentes parametros; 2) desarrollar un analisis de sensibilidad muy completo del modelo, en el que se analice la sensibilidad de la escorrentia superficial, el flujo base, la evapotranspiracion, la humedad del suelo y de la eficiencia enfocada a los diferentes rangos de caudal, a diferentes parametros; 3) comparar dos metodos de analisis de sensibilidad de diferente complejidad y costo computacional; 4) evaluar la efectividad de un algoritmo de optimizacion como herramienta de calibracion del modelo aplicado a diferentes escalas temporales; 5) comparar la influencia que tiene sobre la calibracion de un modelo la seleccion de periodos de calibracion continuos o discontinuos seleccionados en funcion de la variabilidad climatica que contienen; y 6) evaluar la eficiencia del modelo para predecir correctamente los caudales simulados en cuencas mediterraneas de diferente tamano y diferentes condiciones climaticas, tanto cuando el modelo es aplicado en paso horario como diario.