Multi-criteria evaluation of topographic correction methods

Sola Torralba, Ion; González de Audícana Amenábar, María; Álvarez-Mozos, Jesús

Publication:
Multi-criteria evaluation of topographic correction methods

dc.contributor.author	Sola Torralba, Ion
dc.contributor.author	González de Audícana Amenábar, María
dc.contributor.author	Álvarez-Mozos, Jesús
dc.contributor.department	Proyectos e Ingeniería Rural	es_ES
dc.contributor.department	Landa Ingeniaritza eta Proiektuak	eu
dc.date.accessioned	2016-10-27T09:47:40Z
dc.date.available	2018-10-01T23:00:11Z
dc.date.issued	2016
dc.description	Incluye 1 fichero de datos	es_ES
dc.description.abstract	In the last decades, several topographic correction methods (TOC) have been proposed, but there is not an agreement on the best method. Furthermore, different evaluation criteria have been used in the past, and there is not any simple and objective evaluation procedure to measure the quality of the correction. Consequently, a multicriteria analysis of widely used topographic correction methods is required that evaluates their performance over different sensors, terrain and temporal configurations. In this work, ten TOC methods were assessed using seven different evaluation strategies. The analysis was carried out for three SPOT5 images acquired over a mountainous area of northern Spain. The images had different acquisition dates and solar angles, so as to evaluate performance under varying illumination conditions. The results obtained showed that Statistic-Empiricalmethod, CCorrection and Sun-Canopy-Sensor+C performed the best, and differences were minor when favorable illumination conditions were considered. For the seven tested evaluation strategies, interquartile range reduction of land covers or the comparison of sunlit and shaded slopes gave very similar results, whereas there were greater contrasts among other criteria.	en
dc.description.sponsorship	Part of the research presented in this paper is funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness in the frame of the ESP2013-48458-C4-2-P project.	en
dc.embargo.lift	2018-10-01
dc.embargo.terms	2018-10-01
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	en
dc.format.mimetype	application/zip	en
dc.identifier.doi	10.1016/j.rse.2016.07.002
dc.identifier.issn	0034-4257 (Print)
dc.identifier.issn	1879-0704 (Electronic)
dc.identifier.uri	https://academica-e.unavarra.es/handle/2454/22503
dc.language.iso	eng	en
dc.publisher	Elsevier	en
dc.relation.ispartof	Remote Sensing of Environment 184 (2016) 247–262	en
dc.relation.projectID	info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//ESP2013-48458-C4-2-P/ES/	en
dc.relation.publisherversion	https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.07.002
dc.rights	© 2016 Elsevier B.V. The manuscript version is made available under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.	en
dc.rights.accessRights	Acceso abierto / Sarbide irekia	es
dc.rights.accessRights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess	en
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject	Topographic correction	en
dc.subject	Evaluation	en
dc.subject	Comparison	en
dc.subject	Multi-criteria	en
dc.title	Multi-criteria evaluation of topographic correction methods	en
dc.type	Artículo / Artikulua	es
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article	en
dc.type.version	Versión aceptada / Onetsi den bertsioa	es
dc.type.version	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion	en
dspace.entity.type	Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication	1c23b7f5-e29a-4d8d-ad82-9236d69a071d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication	11f357a1-5ba6-4243-afc1-3616f2f5480d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication	f2f80825-fc58-4e45-9814-9eb10b68c4a9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery	1c23b7f5-e29a-4d8d-ad82-9236d69a071d