Urban cooling potential and cost comparison of heat mitigation techniques for their impact on the lower atmosphere

dc.contributor.authorKhan, Ansar
dc.contributor.authorCarlosena Remírez, Laura
dc.contributor.authorKhorat, Samiran
dc.contributor.authorKhatun, Rupali
dc.contributor.authorDas, Debashish
dc.contributor.authorDoan, Quang-Van
dc.contributor.authorHamdi, Rafiq
dc.contributor.authorAziz, Sk Mohammad
dc.contributor.authorAkbari, Hashem
dc.contributor.authorSantamouris, Mattheos
dc.contributor.authorNiyogi, Dev
dc.contributor.departmentIngenieríaes_ES
dc.contributor.departmentIngeniaritzaeu
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-06T13:38:21Z
dc.date.available2023-09-06T13:38:21Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.date.updated2023-09-06T13:29:53Z
dc.description.abstractCool materials and rooftop vegetation help achieve urban heating mitigation as they can reduce building cooling demands. This study assesses the cooling potential of different mitigation technologies using Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)- taking case of a tropical coastal climate in the Kolkata Metropolitan Area. The model was validated using data from six meteorological sites. The cooling potential of eight mitigation scenarios was evaluated for: three cool roofs, four green roofs, and their combination (cool-city). The sensible heat, latent heat, heat storage, 2-m ambient temperature, surface temperature, air temperature, roof temperature, and urban canopy temperature was calculated. The effects on the urban boundary layer were also investigated. The different scenarios reduced the daytime temperature of various urban components, and the effect varied nearly linearly with increasing albedo and green roof fractions. For example, the maximum ambient temperature decreased by 3.6 °C, 0.9 °C, and 1.4 °C for a cool roof with 85% albedo, 100% rooftop vegetation, and their combination. The cost of different mitigation scenarios was assumed to depend on the construction options, location, and market prices. The potential for price per square meter and corresponding temperature decreased was related to one another. Recognizing the complex relationship between scenarios and construction options, the reduction in the maximum and minimum temperature across different cool and green roof cases were used for developing the cost estimates. This estimate thus attempted a summary of the price per degree of cooling for the different potential technologies. Higher green fraction, cool materials, and their combination generally reduced winds and enhanced buoyancy. The surface changes alter the lower atmospheric dynamics such as low-level vertical mixing and a shallower boundary layer and weakened horizontal convective rolls during afternoon hours. Although cool materials offer the highest temperature reductions, the cooling resulting from its combination and a green roof strategy could mitigate or reverse the summertime heat island effect. The results highlight the possibilities for heat mitigation and offer insight into the different strategies and costs for mitigating the urban heating and cooling demands.en
dc.description.sponsorshipDev Niyogi acknowledges fnancial support from US NOAA-NIHHIS (NA21OAR4310146; Program Manager: Hunter Jones); the NASA Interdisciplinary Sciences program (80NSSC20K1262 and 80NSSC20K1268), the U.S. National Science Foundation (1835739, 2051110, and 2228205), and the University of Texas at Austin for William Stamps Farish Chair funds and the Bridging Barriers/Planet Texas 2050 initiativeen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationKhan, A., Carlosena, L., Khorat, S., Khatun, R., Das, D., Doan, Q.-V., Hamdi, R., Aziz, S. M., Akbari, H., Santamouris, M., Niyogi, D. (2023) Urban cooling potential and cost comparison of heat mitigation techniques for their impact on the lower atmosphere. Computational Urban Science, 3(26), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-023-00101-1.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s43762-023-00101-1
dc.identifier.issn2730-6852
dc.identifier.urihttps://academica-e.unavarra.es/handle/2454/46238
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.relation.ispartofComputational Urban Science, 3(26), 2023en
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-023-00101-1
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2023. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,en
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectUrban heatingen
dc.subjectCool roofsen
dc.subjectGreen roofsen
dc.subjectCool cityen
dc.subjectWRF/SLUCMen
dc.subjectBuilding cooling demanden
dc.titleUrban cooling potential and cost comparison of heat mitigation techniques for their impact on the lower atmosphereen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication687a0a58-08fb-4317-b3df-a35394add526
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery687a0a58-08fb-4317-b3df-a35394add526

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Khan_UrbanCooling.pdf
Size:
4.51 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.78 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: