Analysing the relationship between QM, performance appraisal and pay for performance

dc.contributor.authorBayo Moriones, José Alberto
dc.contributor.authorTorre Martínez, Rocío de la
dc.contributor.departmentEnpresen Kudeaketaeu
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute for Advanced Research in Business and Economics - INARBEen
dc.contributor.departmentGestión de Empresases_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-30T06:39:54Z
dc.date.available2021-12-30T06:39:54Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper is to analyse the relationship between quality management, performance appraisal and pay for performance in a sample of 203 manufacturing plants (including firms that do not apply quality management) in Spain employing at least 20 workers. We make a distinction between collaboration with suppliers, customer focus and the use of quality tools. This consideration of quality management as multidimensional will help to disentangle the complex interrelationships with performance appraisal and pay for performance. Our findings point to a positive association of customer focus, collaboration with suppliers and quality tools with performance appraisal evaluating results and behaviours. Regarding pay for performance, closer collaboration with customers is positively related to individual pay for performance. The use of quality tools is positively related to individual and firm pay for performance. The managerial implications point out that there is still room for improving the effectiveness of quality initiatives by incorporating changes in pay for performance and performance appraisal oriented to the adaptation to the principles of quality management. From the theoretical perspective, our paper underlines the importance of not considering quality management as a unidimensional reality when examining its relationship with other management practices.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe first author acknowledges the funding received from the Spanish Ministry of Science (project ECO2017-86305-C4-4-R, AEI/FEDER, UE).en
dc.format.extent29 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14783363.2021.1933422
dc.identifier.issn1478-3363
dc.identifier.urihttps://academica-e.unavarra.es/handle/2454/41653
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.ispartofTotal Quality Management and Business Excellenceen
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/ECO2017-86305-C4-4-R/ES/
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2021.1933422
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2021. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectQuality managementen
dc.subjectPerformance appraisalen
dc.subjectPay for performanceen
dc.titleAnalysing the relationship between QM, performance appraisal and pay for performanceen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication25ceb8e8-7961-4eca-ad3d-f3169dd37196
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationab7c5c33-4291-41dc-8dc5-716923d0edbd
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery25ceb8e8-7961-4eca-ad3d-f3169dd37196

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2021100107-Bayo_AnalysingRelationship.pdf
Size:
703.54 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: