Allocating the costs of cleaning a river: expected responsibility versus median responsibility
Date
Authors
Director
Publisher
Project identifier
- AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/PGC2018-093542-B-I00/ES/
- AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/ECO2017-91589-EXP/
- MINECO//ECO2014-52616-R/ES/
- AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/ECO2017-82241-R/ES/
- MINECO//ECO2015-67519-P/ES/
- AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/PID2019-110783GB-I00/ES/
Impacto
Abstract
We consider the problem of cleaning a transboundary river, proposed by Ni and Wang (Games Econ Behav 60:176–186, 2007). A river is modeled as a segment divided into subsegments, each occupied by one region, from upstream to downstream. The waste is transferred from one region to the next at some rate. Since this transfer rate may be unknown, the social planner could have uncertainty over each region’s responsibility. Two natural candidates to distribute the costs in this setting would be the method that assigns to each region its expected responsibility and the one that assigns to each region its median responsibility. We show that the latter is equivalent to the Upstream Responsibility method (Alcalde-Unzu et al. in Games Econ Behav 90:134–150, 2015) and the former is a new method that we call Expected Responsibility. We compare both solutions and analyze them in terms of a new property of monotonicity.
Description
Keywords
Department
Faculty/School
Degree
Doctorate program
item.page.cita
item.page.rights
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020
Los documentos de Academica-e están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a no ser que se indique lo contrario.