Heat dissipating upper body compression garment: thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and perceptual responses

dc.contributor.authorLeoz Abaurrea, Iker
dc.contributor.authorTam, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorAguado Jiménez, Roberto
dc.contributor.departmentCiencias de la Saludes_ES
dc.contributor.departmentOsasun Zientziakeu
dc.contributor.funderUniversidad Pública de Navarra / Nafarroako Unibertsitate Publikoaes
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-20T08:02:47Z
dc.date.available2019-06-20T08:02:47Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of an upper body compression garment (UBCG) on thermoregulatory responses during cycling in a controlled laboratory thermoneutral environment (~23°C).A secondary aim was to determine the cardiovascular and perceptual responses when wearing the garment. Methods: Sixteen untrained participants (age: 21.3 ± 5.7 years; peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak): 50.88 ± 8.00 mL/min/kg; mean ± SD) performed 2 cycling trials in a thermoneutral environment (~23°C) wearing either UBCG or control (Con) garment. Testing consisted of a 5 min rest on a cycle ergometer, followed by 4 bouts of cycling for 14 min at ~50%VO2peak, with 1 min rest between each bout. At the end of these bouts there was 10 min of passive recovery. During the entire protocol rectal temperature (Trec), skin temperature (Tskin), mean body temperature (Tbody), and heat storage (HS) were measured. Heart rate (HR), VO2, pH, hematocrit (Hct), plasma electrolytes, weight loss (Wloss), and perceptual responses were also measured. Results: There were no significant differences between garments for Tskin, HS, HR, VO2, pH, Hct, plasma electrolyte concentration, Wloss, and perceptual responses during the trial. Trec did not differ between garment conditions during rest, exercise, or recovery although a greater reduction in Trec wearing UBCG (p = 0.01) was observed during recovery. Lower Tbody during recovery was found when wearing UBCG (36.82°C ± 0.3°C vs. 36.99°C ± 0.24°C). Conclusion: Wearing a UBCG did not benefit thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and perceptual responses during exercise although it was found to lower Tbody during recovery, which suggests that it could be used as a recovery tool after exercise.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the Public University of Navarre.en
dc.format.extent7 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jshs.2016.01.008
dc.identifier.issn2095-2546
dc.identifier.urihttps://academica-e.unavarra.es/handle/2454/33457
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Sport and Health Science 8 (2019) 450-456en
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2016.01.008
dc.rights© 2019 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Shanghai University of Sport. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.en
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectBody temperatureen
dc.subjectCompression garmenten
dc.subjectCyclingen
dc.subjectHeat dissipationen
dc.subjectThermoregulationen
dc.titleHeat dissipating upper body compression garment: thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and perceptual responsesen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationff616111-a85b-4bd3-9c7e-94982d313ff8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication41367ea8-f3cf-4544-8cb7-fb4f57da6283
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryff616111-a85b-4bd3-9c7e-94982d313ff8

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Leoz_HeatDissipating.pdf
Size:
900.36 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: