Publication:
Comparison of bioelectrical impedance analysis, slaughter skinfold-thickness equations, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for estimating body fat percentage in Colombian children and adolescents with excess of adiposity

dc.contributor.authorGonzález Ruiz, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorMedrano Echeverría, María
dc.contributor.authorCorrea Bautista, Jorge Enrique
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Hermoso, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorPrieto Benavides, Daniel Humberto
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute on Innovation and Sustainable Development in Food Chain - ISFOODen
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-17T12:13:10Z
dc.date.available2019-07-17T12:13:10Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractDual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been considered a reference method for measuring body fat percentage (BF%) in children and adolescents with an excess of adiposity. However, given that the DXA technique is impractical for routine field use, there is a need to investigate other methods that can accurately determine BF%. We studied the accuracy of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) technology, including foot-to-foot and hand-to-foot impedance, and Slaughter skinfold-thickness equations in the measurement of BF%, compared with DXA, in a population of Latin American children and adolescents with an excess of adiposity. A total of 127 children and adolescents (11-17 years of age; 70% girls) from the HEPAFIT (Exercise Training and Hepatic Metabolism in Overweight/Obese Adolescent) study were included in the present work. BF% was measured on the same day using two BIA analysers (Seca((R)) 206, Allers Hamburg, Germany and Model Tanita((R)) BC-418((R)), TANITA Corporation, Sportlife Tokyo, Japan), skinfold measurements (Slaughter equation), and DXA (Hologic Horizon DXA System((R)), Quirugil, Bogota, Columbia). Agreement between measurements was analysed using t-tests, Bland-Altman plots, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (c). There was a significant correlation between DXA and the other BF% measurement methods (r > 0.430). According to paired t-tests, in both sexes, BF% assessed by BIA analysers or Slaughter equations differ from BF% assessed by DXA (p < 0.001). The lower and upper limits of the differences compared with DXA were 6.3-22.9, 2.2-2.8, and -3.2-21.3 (95% CI) in boys and 2.3-14.8, 2.4-20.1, and 3.9-18.3 (95% CI) in girls for Seca((R)) mBCA, Tanita((R)) BC 420MA, and Slaughter equations, respectively. Concordance was poor between DXA and the other methods of measuring BF% (c < 0.5). BIA analysers and Slaughter equations underestimated BF% measurements compared to DXA, so they are not interchangeable methods for assessing BF% in Latin American children and adolescents with excess of adiposity.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author C.A.A.S was given a doctoral scholarship from Brazilian government by CAPES (Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel) (Proc: 9588-13-2). MM is supported by grants from the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sport FPU14/03329 (predoctoral grant) and EST17/00210 (short stay grant). KG-R received a scholarship from Universidad del Rosario, Colombia, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, to do a Doctorate. The HEPAFIT Study was carried out with the financial support of Instituto Colombiano para el Desarrollo de la Ciencia y la Tecnologia "Francisco Jose de Caldas" COLCIENCIAS (contract code 59700 and no. 122277757900).en
dc.format.extent14 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/nu10081086
dc.identifier.issn2072-6643
dc.identifier.urihttps://academica-e.unavarra.es/handle/2454/33588
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherMDPIen
dc.relation.ispartofNutrients, 2018, 10, 1086en
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/nu10081086
dc.rights© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.en
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectAdiposityen
dc.subjectBody compositionen
dc.subjectValidation studyen
dc.subjectDXAen
dc.subjectChildrenen
dc.subjectAdolescentsen
dc.titleComparison of bioelectrical impedance analysis, slaughter skinfold-thickness equations, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for estimating body fat percentage in Colombian children and adolescents with excess of adiposityen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen
dc.type.versionVersión publicada / Argitaratu den bertsioaes
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication304856ca-cc85-4094-8ca3-b17f4c5f33de
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery304856ca-cc85-4094-8ca3-b17f4c5f33de

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
114_Gonzalez_ComparisonBioelectrical.pdf
Size:
795.59 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: