Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.creatorCuesta, Manuel J.es_ES
dc.creatorBasterra, Virginiaes_ES
dc.creatorSánchez Torres, Ana Maríaes_ES
dc.creatorPeralta Martín, Víctores_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-29T16:48:42Z
dc.date.available2024-01-29T16:48:42Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationCuesta, M. J., Basterra, V., Sanchez-Torres, A., Peralta, V. (2009) Controversies surrounding the diagnosis of schizophrenia and other psychoses. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 9(10), 1475-1486. https://doi.org/10.1586/ern.09.102.en
dc.identifier.issn1473-7175
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2454/47237
dc.description.abstractThe diagnosis of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders in current psychiatric classifications identifies individuals who are severely ill but who have few clinical characteristics in common. The usual picture of psychotic patients is a mixture of mood and psychotic symptoms. Fortunately, clinicians do not base their therapeutic strategies exclusively on diagnosis, but also on symptom predominance. Thus, clinicians’ treatments have been dimensional in nature for years, although, until recently, their psychiatric classifications had been mainly categorical. The main principle in psychosis classification has been the Kraepelinian dichotomy, despite its lack of enduring empirical validation. Without doubt, current psychiatric classifications have made great strides in reliability and clinical utility, although these advantages have not been enough to compensate for their shortcomings concerning validity. It has recently been suggested that the Kraepelinian dichotomy may be hindering progress in neurobiological research within psychosis. Mounting evidence is now fuelling a paradigm shift in the ongoing process of review of psychiatric classifications toward the introduction of complementary dimensional indicators of psychiatric categorical diagnoses. This new approach will allow us to understand psychosis as prototypical extremes of a severity continuum. The gradients of this continuum may begin with subtle expressions in the general population, continue with milder forms in relatives of psychotic patients and subclinical cases and finally reach the prototypical forms of psychosis at the other extreme. Future complementary dimensional indicators will require sound instruments capable of reflecting a multidimensional assessment of psychopathological symptoms, polydiagnostic interviews and the assessment of a wide range of nonsymptomatic domains. These new methods of assessment merging created by the shift toward a dimensional paradigm will be applied in the forthcoming new diagnostic criteria and may allow for a phenome-wide scanning for psychosis.en
dc.description.sponsorshipSupported in part by grants 55/2007 from the Department of Health of the Navarre Regional Government, PI81026 from FIS (Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias) of the Spanish Ministry of Health, and 2008/030 from The National Drug Plan of Spain.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen
dc.relation.ispartofExpert Review of Neurotherapeutics 2009, 9(10), 1475-1486en
dc.subjectDiagnostic issuesen
dc.subjectPhenome-wide scanningen
dc.subjectPsychopathologyen
dc.subjectPsychosisen
dc.subjectSchizophreniaen
dc.titleControversies surrounding the diagnosis of schizophrenia and other psychosesen
dc.typeArtículo / Artikuluaes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen
dc.date.updated2024-01-29T16:29:24Z
dc.contributor.departmentCiencias de la Saludes_ES
dc.contributor.departmentOsasun Zientziakeu
dc.rights.accessRightsAcceso abierto / Sarbide irekiaes
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.identifier.doi10.1586/ern.09.102
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1586/ern.09.102
dc.type.versionVersión aceptada / Onetsi den bertsioaes
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionen


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem


El Repositorio ha recibido la ayuda de la Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología para la realización de actividades en el ámbito del fomento de la investigación científica de excelencia, en la Línea 2. Repositorios institucionales (convocatoria 2020-2021).
Logo MinisterioLogo Fecyt