Mixed reality in undergraduate nursing education: a systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits and challenges

Date

2025-04-22

Authors

Guillén Aguinaga, Laura
Rodríguez-Díaz, Blanca
Montejo, Rocío
Aguinaga Ontoso, Enrique
Guillén-Aguinaga, Miriam

Director

Publisher

MDPI
Acceso abierto / Sarbide irekia
Artículo / Artikulua
Versión publicada / Argitaratu den bertsioa

Project identifier

Impacto
Google Scholar
No disponible en Scopus

Abstract

Background: Nursing Schools are incorporating Mixed Reality (MR) into student training to enable them to confront challenging or infrequently encountered scenarios in their practice and ensure their preparedness. This systematic review evaluates the benefits and challenges of implementing MR in nursing curricula. Materials and Methods: A search was conducted in PubMed, WOS, Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL for studies published between 2011 and 2023. The search strategy used was (nurses OR nurse OR nursing) AND mixed reality AND simulation. Inclusion criteria required that studies focus on undergraduate nursing students and be written in English or Spanish. Exclusion criteria included reviews, bibliometric studies, and articles that did not separately report undergraduate nursing student results. Quality was evaluated with the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A meta-analysis was conducted on studies with control groups to compare MR's effectiveness against traditional teaching methods. Results: Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. MR was widely used to improve clinical judgment, patient safety, technical skill acquisition, and student confidence. The meta-analysis found that MR reduced anxiety (Cohen's d = -0.73, p < 0.001). However, its impact on knowledge acquisition and skill development was inconsistent. There was no improvement over traditional methods (p = 0.466 and p = 0.840). Despite positive qualitative findings, methodological variability, small sample sizes, and publication bias contributed to mixed quantitative results. The main challenges were cybersickness, usability, high costs, and limited institutional access to MR technology. Conclusions: Although MR can help nursing education by decreasing students' anxiety, its efficacy remains inconclusive. Future research should use larger, randomized controlled trials to validate MR's role in nursing education.

Description

Keywords

Mixed reality, Augmented reality, Virtual reality, Nursing education, Nursing education research, Systematic review, Meta-analysis

Department

Ciencias de la Salud / Osasun Zientziak

Faculty/School

Degree

Doctorate program

item.page.cita

Guillen-Aguinaga, L., Rayón-Valpuesta, E., Guillen-Aguinaga, S., Rodriguez-Diaz, B., Montejo, R., Alas-Brun, R., Aguinaga-Ontoso, E., Onambele, L., Guillen-Aguinaga, M., Guillen-Grima, F., Aguinaga-Ontoso, I. (2025) Mixed reality in undergraduate nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits and challenges. Nursing Reports, 15(5), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15050137.

item.page.rights

© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.

Licencia

Los documentos de Academica-e están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a no ser que se indique lo contrario.