Measuring job risks when hedonic wage models do not do the job

dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Susana
dc.contributor.authorMartínez de Morentin, Sara
dc.contributor.authorErro Garcés, Amaya
dc.contributor.departmentGestión de Empresases_ES
dc.contributor.departmentEnpresen Kudeaketaeu
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute for Advanced Research in Business and Economics - INARBEen
dc.contributor.departmentEconomíaes_ES
dc.contributor.departmentEkonomiaeu
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-13T20:02:59Z
dc.date.available2025-02-13T20:02:59Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-10
dc.date.updated2025-02-13T19:52:28Z
dc.description.abstractThe theory of compensating differentials predicts that wages should compensate for differences in job characteristics, including the risk of death on the job. Empirically estimating these compensating differentials in real-world labor markets has, however, proven difficult. This paper explores the potential of job satisfaction regressions as an additional valuation approach to estimate the tradeoffs between wages and job amenities along the wage-amenity frontier. In this approach, job satisfaction scores act as a proxy for utility at work, and can be used to directly estimate the tradeoffs between wages and amenities at the job taken by the worker. Conventional hedonic wage regressions with data on thirty-five thousand workers across thirty European countries show limited evidence that European workers facing larger job risks and other workplace disamenities receive higher wages. On the other hand, using the same data, workers who perceive their jobs to be riskier, are absent more days from work due to work accidents, or are exposed to worse conditions at their workplace are less satisfied with their jobs, ceteris paribus, revealing a negative valuation of those job disamenities.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was partially supported by the National Institutes of Health under Award 5R01AI156866-05 (Ferreira) and Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación under Grant PID2020-115018RB-C31 (Erro-Garcés and Martínez de Morentin).
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationFerreira, S., Martínez de Morentin, S., Erro-Garcés, A. (2025) Measuring job risks when hedonic wage models do not do the job. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 130, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103120.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103120
dc.identifier.issn0095-0696
dc.identifier.urihttps://academica-e.unavarra.es/handle/2454/53401
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 130, 2025, 103120
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/PID2020-115018RB-C31/ES/
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103120
dc.rights© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectJob amenitiesen
dc.subjectOn-the-job risken
dc.subjectExperienced preferenceen
dc.subjectJob satisfactionen
dc.subjectHedonic wagesen
dc.subjectStated preferenceen
dc.subjectValue of a statistical lifeen
dc.titleMeasuring job risks when hedonic wage models do not do the joben
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione046d0bc-4a31-4390-b6a1-bc45db1f7a30
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7f9a4a37-34a1-4ce5-b049-005d07038aea
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye046d0bc-4a31-4390-b6a1-bc45db1f7a30

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ferreira_Measuring.pdf
Size:
3.29 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: