Publication:
Predictive validity of the EuropAsi: clinical diagnosis or composite scoring?

Date

2012

Director

Publisher

Elsevier
Acceso abierto / Sarbide irekia
Artículo / Artikulua
Versión aceptada / Onetsi den bertsioa

Project identifier

Abstract

This study assessed the correlation between the areas of the Interviewer Severity Rating (ISR) and the areas of the Composite Scores (CS) of the EuropAsi. It evaluated the predictive validity of both types of scoring with regard to completion of treatment. For this purpose, 252 patients were interviewed using the EuropAsi. 38.9% of patients discontinued treatment. Results indicated a high correlation between various areas of the ISR and the CS, except the legal and family-others scales. Regarding predictive results, patients with a score greater than 3 in the ISR family area were more likely to quit the programme compared to patients with a score lower than 3. Patients with a CS score that was greater than 0.34 in the alcohol-use area were more likely to drop-out of treatment. When both ISR and CS scores were included in the prediction model, the ISR family area was a better predictor.

Description

Keywords

EuropAsi, Composite Scores, Interviewer Severity Rating, Drop-out rates, Treatment, Drug dependence

Department

Psicología y Pedagogía / Psikologia eta Pedagogia

Faculty/School

Degree

Doctorate program

item.page.cita

item.page.rights

© 2012 Elsevier Inc. The manuscript version is made available under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.

Los documentos de Academica-e están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a no ser que se indique lo contrario.