John Stuart Mill and proportional representation. A misunderstanding
Date
Authors
Director
Publisher
Impacto
Abstract
Mill scholars usually classify as 'proportional' the theory of political representation sustained by John Stuart Mill. However, Mill did not use the term 'proportional' in his texts, and 'proportional representation' as understood today has little to do with what Mill really proposed. A hypothesis is offered to explain the origin of the 'proportionalist' interpretation that was accepted at the beginning of the 20st century. It is concluded that specialists in Mill should not use the word 'proportional' when referring to his conception of political representation. In addition, political scientists should not quote Mill as the founder of proportional representation.
Description
Keywords
Department
Faculty/School
Degree
Doctorate program
item.page.cita
item.page.rights
Los documentos de Academica-e están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a no ser que se indique lo contrario.