Prenatal care, son preference, and the sex ratio at birth

Date

2025-02-05

Authors

Beltrán Tapia, Francisco J.

Director

Publisher

Duke University Press
Acceso abierto / Sarbide irekia
Artículo / Artikulua
Versión aceptada / Onetsi den bertsioa

Project identifier

  • AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/PID2020-115183RB-C21/ES/ recolecta
  • AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2021-2023/PID2021-127119NB-I00/ES/ recolecta
Impacto
OpenAlexGoogle Scholar
No disponible en Scopus

Abstract

The sex ratio at birth (SRB) in Spain jumped abruptly in the late 1970s and temporarily reached values of more than 109 boys per 100 girls in the early 1980s. This article shows that health care system expansion increased the likelihood of male births in Spain between 1975 and 1995. By facilitating the delivery of preterm and dystocic babies and improving overall maternal conditions, these developments increased the survival chances of male fetuses, who are biologically weaker than females. However, biological factors alone cannot explain the biased SRB. Our analysis shows that the availability of prenatal sex determination technologies and a strong son preference nurtured by the Francoist dictatorship fostered gender-biased behaviors that resulted in an excessively high SRB. The lack of evidence on sex-specific abortions suggests that women took better care of themselves when carrying a son. The spread of gender-egalitarian values brought about by the end of the dictatorship and the transition to democracy undermined son preference and returned the SRB to normal levels.

Description

Keywords

Sex ratio at birth, Son preference, Gender discrimination, Maternal health

Department

Economía / Ekonomia / Institute for Advanced Research in Business and Economics - INARBE

Faculty/School

Degree

Doctorate program

item.page.cita

Echavarri, R., Beltrán Tapia, F. (2025). Prenatal care, son preference, and the sex ratio at birth. Demography, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-11798263.

item.page.rights

© 2025 The Authors. Creative Commons BY 4.0

Licencia

Los documentos de Academica-e están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a no ser que se indique lo contrario.